Digg Founder Kevin Rose Launches Private Newsletter Called Foundation
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
Also the "private newsletter" bit is a little misleading, since it seems like all the podcasts will be available for free, you just have to wait a week.
Aside from that, it sounds like a very interesting project that, as compelling and simple as it sounds, I don't see a lot of people pulling off but Rose.
I'm tired of hearing from all the "stars". I want to listen to interviews with normal hackers like myself who are either struggling to find themselves online or starting to experience a bit of success.
I want to hear from people who are building small online businesses - charging money. I'm so burnt out on social/advertising/big exit plays.
He interviews these kinds of people all the time and while the (usually Skype-based) interviews aren't fancy, the content is fantastic. Andrew is a great interviewer and he digs deep into the core of whatever the issue at hand is.
According to the site the main difference with premium is that you get access to programs older than two weeks. But there are lots of older programs available both via the web site and via iTunes.
I kind of assumed the premium program was donationware.
Kevin though... so many of his questions have the word 'like' in them.
"Like, what was that like?" or "Like, a working prototype?, like you and a buddy or something like that?"
Whenever founders evolve into tech-scenesters though, I think it's a good time to be bearish on their startups (I'm thinking of a lot of other names here too).
As Picasso said, "Without great solitude no serious work is possible."
What's interesting is that 3 months in and only 5 posts later (remember, at $3.99/month) Dave has most recently published a post simply titled "Apology" (http://letter.ly/davemorin). No idea exactly what it contains because of course you have to subscribe but one can speculate and it does seem telling.
BTW this isn't a slight at Dave M - he took a chance on this (I think Letter.ly founder Sam Lessin and him are good pals) and it didn't work out - esp with the launch of Path. No biggie.
However, I fail to see how this is a good inspiration on Roses part to set up Foundation.
Finally, producing video is expensive (he probably has a camera man, there's editing time, hosting, etc) - I can't really see how this pays off either. You are in that weird position where $3.99 is going to create a chasm for many folks yet you'd have to sell quite a lot of subs to make it work financially.
It all ends up on Revision 3 (after the first week) anyhow so it's just more content for them to monetize like they do their other videos. His cameraman is also his regular Rev3 guy Graham. http://twitter.com/#!/grahamhancock/status/22008135078125568
I do wonder, also, if these paywalls can work. My initial thought was that the money would incentivise the content creators in a way that blogging doesnt, but a similar abandonment of regular writing is apparent in the letterly newsletters I have looked at.
I would much rather pay $4 per month for exclusive content, so I'll likely wait until it's free.
However, this resurgence of e-mail newsletters (of sorts) is timely and valuable.
Someone should build a mailchimp clone that makes it easy to distribute and charge for audio and video in addition to text.
The fact is that most email clients wouldn't support it, and the user experience for the recipients would, therefore, suck.