Said bad actors probably already have access to the source — or could get it if they wanted it.
Ultimately your argument applies to all life or death code, even code we put inside our bodies, which as you mentioned, is also highly specific and specalized.
Because the bar is higher there should be less review is a contradiction.
APT (often not a State) conversations are pointless where plausible deniability is ignored as a desirable property.
No one really would benefit from open sourcing it without being able to (security) test it in realistic scenarios. Obviously security researchers would profit in discovering bugs which may have no relevance in reality, to increase their fame.
There are always bugs in software, some people depend on keeping them secret.