The next change will be that it will trick users into thinking they are on are on a real site like example.com but will instead be on Google.com/example.com.
But chrome will remove google.com just like http/s.
The next change will be that it will trick users into thinking they are on are on a real site like example.com but will instead be on Google.com/example.com.
But chrome will remove google.com just like http/s.
This is really sad and dangerous for the web. I don't know why people aren't up in arms over this kind of devious behavior from Google.
If Microsoft had pulled this in the late 90s early 2000s there would have been senate hearing and talks of breaking up their monopoly.
The question is more a philosophical one. If it’s wrong that the URL doesn’t point to where files are “actually” stored. Or rather that the package delivery and package creator aren’t the same party. In my mind this hasn’t been the case for a long time now anyway.
https://amp.dev/documentation/guides-and-tutorials/optimize-...
The issue is deceit and fraud. A browser should _never_ ever under any circumstances be able to display one companies domain differently than all others. Especially when it's their domain.
Google.com, or any of Alphabet's domains, should not get special preference or treatment. And they certainly should not be trimmed out of an address for the benefit of Alphabet/Google to the detriment of all others.