Reality does not judder.
If you want judder for some artistic purpose, you can have that, just like any other reality-distorting filter.
Some shots are intentionally blurry for valid artistic purposes. Should all movies and tvs be blurry at all times? Some shots are intentionally monochrome for valid artistic purposes. Should all movies and all tvs be b&w or red tinted at all times? Some shots are intentionally too bright or too dark, for valid artistic purposes... You want stroboscopic stop-motion, go ahead and use it.
Superior reproductive technology in no way prevents you from creating a scene that has that and any other kind of artificially applied crappiness like static interference or low resolution or analog scan lines... But crappy reproductive technology does preclude the other 99.9% of the time when you don't want an artificially crappy reproduction.
Video tape was cheaper than film, and tvs and video tape ran at higher frame rates than film, and soap operas were cheaper than movies, and so the one superior aspect of soap operas became associated with "cheap".
It's a freaking ignorant assosciation is all. It's obvious as hell, and you have to be a moron not to recognize why you think "this looks like a soap opera" and see past that.