Revealed: The guy behind IMDb
alexandrosmaragos.com
alexandrosmaragos.com
(Other ad players were there, but nothing as efficient and accessible to any website owner/publisher)
[1]: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1342663/IMDb-...
http://thetvdb.com/ is another open project (the data is CC and the software is GPL) that's used by XBMC, Plex and others. It's aimed at software, not people, but it's good for episode listings.
http://link.moonsoft.com/wired.html
http://www.wired.com/entertainment/music/commentary/listenin...
And yes, most lawyers are sociopaths :), but they are a necessary evil sometimes.
People sometimes get angry at others who live without wanting to pay for this and that. For example music. If people stop paying for money and that industry fails, so be it. Others make music in their free time because it is their hobby and passion.
Seriously? x-small?! No matter how pretty you think your site looks if people can't read the fucking text it doesn't matter. On top of that the contrast is terrible making it even worse.
font: x-small "Trebuchet MS", Trebuchet, Verdana, Sans-serif;
font-size/* */:/**/small;
font-size: /**/small;
Sorry for the tangent I'm just tired of having to bump up the font size 2-5 times on every damn site I visit. And now I feel old. Shit.(If you reply mentioning readability I will punch you :p Readability is not a cure-all and messes up some pages)
My default font size is 16pt and that should be enough imo, but x-small applied to 16pt is still small. My display does have a relatively high DPI at ~130, but that's why I bump up my default font size. :/ I just bumped it to 18pt for good measure.
Despite the joke about feeling old I'm only 28 and have good enough vision w/ my contacts in.
Regardless of my DPI and/or default font size, there is absolutely no good reason to use x-small on a site whose sole purpose is to display articles for people to read. That is pure lunacy if you ask me.
I was very pleased to find several alternatives listed in this thread, thank-you!
"...asked if the sale had made him and his group of volunteers rich..."
But, just to save you the bother:
a) one guy started it, but it is not a one-man show, nor has it ever really been b) the data was sourced (Wikipedia-style, you might say) on Usenet, back in the pre-WWW days. Since then, the number of sources has multiplied. c) it goes to Amazon, who bought the IMDB back in '98. d) Of course not. He's a VP at Amazon. There is a staff (of unspecified size) working on IMDB.
1. get users to submit a bunch of content to you in an open system for free
2. close the system and claim ownership of the database that your users helped create
3. profit!
Which is why being bought out by Amazon is about as good as it gets. They usually find a good way to manage the post acquisition period, most other companies botch that completely.
I think having the founder still working there and not jumping ship as soon as some vesting period is over is a good advertisement for being acquired by amazon. Also it's still it's own site, could have easily been rolled into amazon in an attempt to push more DVD sales over the years.