This may be someone’s first submission and they may consequently not be aware of style guides, tools which can help lint, etc?
This may be someone’s first submission and they may consequently not be aware of style guides, tools which can help lint, etc?
Also, given the amount of patches I have to read, uniform style really does matter. Unconventional style breaks the flow and detracts from the important bits.
Also, I'm not aware of a lint like tool that works on diffs. Many of the patches never get further than my MUA.
Personally I prefer to be less strict about style whenever possible, but then I prefer to work in safer languages, and I don't have the same firehose to deal with.
I didn't see any discussion about tradeoffs, alternative approaches, or a survey of what other systems do for this kind of functionality, or detailed benchmark results.
The tone was roughly what I'd want people to give me in a code review -- the only problem is that it was trivial, and could have been summarized as "Fix the style, check it with $tool"
That review also had a comment about an implicit limit on the number of objects, which is caused by a limit on the amount of physically contiguous memory the kernel memory allocator can obtain at once, and a comment that the code being reviewed would allow for a large increase of the reference count of a couple of important structures. Both appear to be very technical comments to me.