Paige Thompson, Capital One Hacking Suspect, Left a Trail Online
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
She was only transwoman allowed in the ZCLUB per mgt. She got drugged and used as scapegoat. I woke up in Swedish Edmonds. Idiots let me go once they realized my comps were at my hotel. I screamed I'm gonnna be pissed if I miss my hotel brunch. It was 2a not afternoon. Claim I assaulted 4 shorelines PD. Never hit anyone in my life. I lack fight or flight, no stimuli hence was great at piecing this together and my partner and I dodged a ton of traps ourself. Palantir is here folks and it starts with the gays for monied daddies
Frightenly involves my partner who went Mia from his probation in a coerced LEAD program participant by his "daddy landlord who encouraged employement at z though it would expose to drugs. Conviently probation revoked and a month in Valentines got my first STD because we were being sober, but he was too tired to entertain zClub's "John" James Booth of barebackrts video and hookup Discovered too much underground for me tho porn stars were a thrill, but tech is here folks i am lucky I have money and funding but others are very verenable like Paige and my partner Shane. I've seen 1999 citations close in 2009. It's the poor being rats to each other for the rich's vigilante. Hope to hear her out, bc when I talk to my partner he has a hard time too--we all have antibiotic allergy that seizures and we forget. They tried to in Swedish, but i was not a product of Seattle "LEAD" program where they force you an intensive CDAT to find your deep lvl 3 panic triggers, conveniently paid by the LEAD fundraisers. See #freeshane Twitter fb is showing blocked by DOS
1: https://krebsonsecurity.com/2019/07/capital-one-data-theft-i...
good opsec is hard; middling opsec is reasonably easy; "not bragging about your mad sploits on twitter" is nothing we can trust humans to reasonably do, apparently!
> An April 19, 2019, post in the Github account of "paige•••••thompson" includes a "Server List" of IP addresses associated with the account.
What Github "post" could this be referring to? A README.md/issue/comment in which she for some reason posted the IP addresses she uses with that account?
https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdwa/press-release/file/1188626...
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-07-30/beyond...
It's best to not be loud in the first place.
Clearly not a guy
Edit: Down-votes care to comment why?
Then I realized after seeing what has happened as the masses all came online, while many of us here can probably distinguish between a reliable news source and a hack site or a propaganda outlet—a disturbingly large segment of the population can not.
And to make matters worse, there seems to be a huge number of people who don’t realize they don’t have what it takes to do reliable research to write a story and they don’t have what it takes to understand nuanced subjects in order to explain the subject to readers. Or even worse, they fully realize how ill-equipped they are but don’t care because vulnerable people will still click their ads.
Long story short, I now have just short of 20 subscriptions. Including a few that I rarely read but to me it’s worth it. The collective We really need to increase the signal levels in order to hear over the noise.
Journalism is definitely one of those cases where The Market can easily lead to a race to the bottom situation. Hopefully we’ll see it correct and good journalism will overtake trash, but wow what a rough spot.
Pay-per-article might make some sense, but every time I've seen that they've charged more than I think it's worth. They generally want about a dollar, and I'm thinking pennies. And, of course, I have to decide whether it's worth purchasing before I've read it; at which point it comes down to trusting the publisher - and then maybe I should just get a subscription.
The odds that they will completely overlap are low. However, most people don't have 20. Even those who do mostly read a number of prominent sources: nyt, wapo, wsj are the big three for news these days. Most people subscribe to one, maybe two and read that. This is arguably bad for competition and bad for "indie journalism".
Also, I take issue with some of the points of view espoused by the nyt. Their news content is fairly good (if biased), but my subscription would also go to pay their editorial board. I don't want to purchase that news, because I don't want to fund its production. I wish I could buy a news-only subscription: no "lifestyle", no "fashion", no "editorial", etc. I don't want that stuff. Just news.
I would encourage people — if they can afford it — to pay for a few media sites online.
Serves her right, any way. You've got to be a pretty bad person to put the information of that many people at risk.
Either:
A: She is being framed.
or
B: Capital One's security was (and probably still is) laughable.
She doesn't seem to be being framed. If Capital One's security is horrendous, they are unlikely to be exceptional... so we will see much more of this.
One can possess great technical skills and still be a braggart. Nothing about a lack of OPSEC implies she cannot exploit a vulnerable system.