1) the computers get addicted to big data and need humans to generate massive data sets for them to analyze
2) the AI is not capable of original thought (just advanced pattern matching) and they farm humans for their ingenuity
1) the computers get addicted to big data and need humans to generate massive data sets for them to analyze
2) the AI is not capable of original thought (just advanced pattern matching) and they farm humans for their ingenuity
And I don't just mean "fanon" sense, though, yes, there's an element of that, but more actual sense.
It's still kinda a mess, even from this point of view, but it's pretty good for a Hollywood effort.
Agent Smith said, humans are a virus. I think he was really speaking about the machines—himself—Virulent, amazing, but not genius. Stupid computer. Haha.
At this point I just find and replace battery with cpu when I watch the movie, I know what the creators meant, and that producers fucked it up. I see it as a typo, I dont let it take me too far out of the movie.
I always thought they'd "realize their mistake" in the movie but honestly, the reference works either way. Humans being harvested and cultivated like we do plants or animals.
Would have made it more real and sinister if they showed someone being jettisonned IRL after an Agent takes them over in the Matrix.
Why not simply that the machines are programmed to preserve humans, and that's the most efficient way they had to perform the task? Sort of clipboard factory, but with human life as the constraint.
The characters who believe that in-universe could just be unreliable narrators, as in it's not how it really is, it's just what they assume.
There may be fundamental differences between “biological/analog” and “mechanical/digital” computation, and the Machines keep human brain-farms for distributed biocomputing to complement their own.
After all, they even provide us a shared VM to "train" in.
If it was just for batteries, wouldn't cheetahs on treadmills be more efficient?
IIRC, that's pretty close to the rationale in the original versions of the script, but it was changed because the movie executives thought it was too confusing.
As I said, first time it stuck out so most people, including me at one time, must have just took it at face value.
Still love the film to this day though. Sounds sad but had goosebumps at the end when Neo actually turns out to be the one.
Ha! How banal you are!
JK.
I've seen this movie over thirty times start to finish. Cry almost every time.
After having seen it so thoughrouly to me it's no longer about religion or Jesus. Instead its about one thing. Kung Fu. It's why I return to it again and again.
There were billions of people around, and not that many large mammals, I bet.
It could be misinterpretation of the word power. The survivors and escapees heard power and assumed electricity not realizing power referred to processor throughput.
the only other easy way to retcon it without changing the movie would be to consider the human minds part of the battery tech. similar to how car batteries have programming around them to maximize their safety and charge rates and efficiency, maybe the human minds are part of the overall battery tech, used to keep them charging correctly. it wouldnt be direct energy harvesting tho.
Your idea in (1) is quite similar to the plot twist in The Fall of Hyperion (1991). The AI's in the novel and Hyperion (1989) live within the system of instant-transport "farcaster" gates. They use the human minds that are in transit through the network as their computational power, while at the same time enslaving the human race to an existence of lazy consumption rather than evolution and galactic expansion.
Porting that idea to the world of The Matrix would have been even more sinister, since the human bodies were also trapped in the vats of nutrient goo.
When it came out, hex editing was still the easiest way to cheat at computer games and as such that is how I saw the loading of weapons and even altering local physics like Neo could do.
Your first idea would have been too ahead of it's time in 1999, in 2019 it would be the lazy choice :) I think the second idea has already been done but I can't remember where.
When you get to the scene where Switch holds up the battery, just replace it with a CPU chip.
It makes far more sense if the Matrix is the AI server farm that does all their processing, and human brains are the processors. The AIs need the brains intact, which is why they don't just lobotomize everyone as fetuses and dispense with the VR illusion.
In my personal headcanon, the Matrix is an Inception. Zion is a server rack, and the AIs in it have been fooled into thinking they're human. Their apparent conflict with AI was engineered by humans to condition them to abhor conflict between human and AI, and to erase the idea that they are separate tribes.
Which of course dovetails really clearly with a core theme of the movie, the nature of free will.
First, since both of the wachowski’s have transitioned, “matrix brothers” is no longer an accurate description.
Second: would _now_ be the same as a 2019 if the matrix hadn’t come out 20 years ago? I don’t think so.