``About SUSE
SUSE, the world’s largest independent open source company''
"Wait, isn't RedHat the lar... oooh, someone at SuSE marketing is on the ball."
``About SUSE
SUSE, the world’s largest independent open source company''
"Wait, isn't RedHat the lar... oooh, someone at SuSE marketing is on the ball."
And how is Suse "independent" when it's owned by some swedish private equity group? See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EQT_Partners And, interestingly, see the german wikipedia entry for much more companies owned by EQT. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/EQT_(Unternehmen)
How is Suse independent, again?
And what does "largest open source" mean, anyway? More employees? More customers? More revenue? More contributions to open source?
Even under Microfocus they enjoyed a level of freedom usually associated with independent companies.
If the board was left as is, and EQT is just a shareholder, that could be considered independent - more so than RH + IBM where there was some integration, and RH was becoming a wing of IBM.
But this is all speculation on my part, so YMMV