My habit, of course, is to gently remind the reader of the existence of rsync.net[1][2][3] which, I hope, is the service that perfectly matches your unix/linux use-cases.
But in this comment thread, and to my parent specifically: I am genuinely curious - have you not ever heard of our service ? Very interested to learn this ...
[1] https://www.rsync.net/platform.html
[2] https://www.rsync.net/resources/howto/remote_commands.html
Edit: the platform link is lacking a right margin on mobile, and the landing page’s hero image resizes the page when the URL bar appears/hides, at least on iOS
No I hadn't heard of rsync.net before. I even browsed a few 'listicles' and didn't come across it. I admit even if I had, I'd tend to lean towards more established clouds. But I'll certainly take a peek now since it seems to fit my bill. Thanks for the reminder.
Early winter of this year will mark 18 years that we've been providing cloud storage ... although it wasn't called cloud storage until we created the "rsync.net" corporate entity in 2005 ...
We'll be around if you decide to check us out :)
I tried sparkleshare once but it only syncs to Linux, and you have to set up a sync server
Still rely on Dropbox for file sharing with others though (however, Firefox send is an alternative now)
https://github.com/astrada/google-drive-ocamlfuse is also a good alternative if you're happy with mounting your google drive folder. Gnome now also has pretty well working support for this built in.
In my experience with Insync it crashes a lot and it's very slow compared with Dropbox. And of course they have GDrive's limitations, for example the inability to do block-level sync.
Recommending third party solutions is fine, but can you manage a 300 GB archive of files with them? And can you trust those solutions to not corrupt your data?
I know I wouldn't because I have a hard time trusting the official clients of GDrive or OneDrive after noticing them actually corrupting my data, so no thanks.
As a counter-datapoint, it has never crashed for me and is faster than Dropbox. Though I don't have 300GB files (might explain your crashes and speed issues).
Obviously that's not suitable for everybody for a number of reasons, but for me it's totally erased the appeal dropbox or anything like it.
Their Linux client is great so far in my experience, considering I use it exclusively with Cryptomator (which syncs a lot more individual files).