Everything makes logical sense with details. Native populations through treaties have the right to hunt. Canada wanting to manage populations sets limits. This creates a lotto system. Winners sell them to big game US hunters and the tribe gets the profit.
The asbesto mines are in the French part of Canada which makes shutting them down politically difficult.
Canada is a collectiom of different people who figured out how to get along.
That said, I imagine neither country has a monopoly on such.
https://www.thestar.com/calgary/2019/07/19/a-canadian-couple...
I do not see the harm in controlling the population via hunting instead of letting the populations teether wildly between the carnivores and herbivores as one of them gain dominance in the biosphere...
Also banning something outright just drives the people who want to do it underground where they can't be controlled.
Everyone is polite, and "bloodthirsty" at different times.
The Swiss, the French, the Kenyans, the Mauritians, the Indonesians, the Chileans, literally everyone on earth. Every nation and every human is faced with that dichotomous state of being.
British are no more polite, or bloodthirsty than Americans. Japanese are no more polite, or bloodthirsty than Canadians or Koreans. What you allude to is a very human failure, and is present in every society on earth.
That’s not polite. That’s an internalized response to avoid interacting with others.
Canadians are polite. But they're not apologetic. Your comment misses the mark.
> a country big on marketing itself but ironic in its realities
Add up all the clubbed seals and exported asbestos, and a single ICE automobile is worse.
It seems like anybody can have an extreme opinion with no supporting logic.