How to solve a maze using shaders (2017) [video] | Hacker News Reader

How to solve a maze using shaders (2017) [video]

youtube.com

45 pointsespeed8 comments

Is "shaders" a name that doesn't work anymore? I always perceived them as after effect functions to apply to a scene to do stuff. Ie. Shading. But they seem to be little programs you can run in your GPU? I see more and more examples of using shaders to do stuff that really isn't about taking an output scene and making it pretty.

Or did shaders always have this extended role?

Shaders have always been little programs that run on your GPU, it's just that their original intention was to operate on and then output a texture/set of pixels, which you would render to your scene. However a texture/pixel set is just bits at the end of the day, which can be used to represent other data than colors/alpha as well.

There was never a time they weren't turing complete (e.g. you could always just run the same NAND shader iteratively on the same pixel buffer and compute whatever you like using pixels as binary storage) but once GPUs moved away from fixed pipelines it became easier to do whatever you wanted with them. Nowadays there are also compute type shaders which are kind of what you are talking about, running little functions on the GPU with no intention of actually shading anything with it or even working with graphical entities for that matter.

Shaders are the highly parallel part of graphics programming, so they are where non-graphics programs so their highly parallel work on GPUs, which are traditionally usually designed and used for graphics work but sometimes used for other applications like neural nets and cryptocurrency mining. When these got popular, GPU designers started supporting non-graphics non-shader parallel programming with models like CUDA.

https://gamedev.stackexchange.com/questions/136029/whats-the...

I purchased Shadron as another shader program to play with since Shadertoy was web-based, and I wanted something small and local. I have had great fun playing with it especially while taking lunch at work. I don't code for a living, so this is a true diversion for me during the workday.

The first comment is about the constant Tau.

I never heard of Tau so I had to look it up and came across this: "pi is a confusing and unnatural choice for the circle constant."

So now I am confused.

If a cicle has a diameter of 1 the circumference is pi.

Can someone explain in what context pi might be confusing?

Because the sinus/radians always relates to the radius instead of the diameter?

The main arguments are that a circle is defined by its radius, not its diameter, and that in most cases when you reference Pi in mathematics/engineering you actually use 2Pi.

From the horse's mouth: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hhjsSN-AiU

Animations at 5:00 and 6:00, explanation at 1:00.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com