* Cans have to be sorted and warehoused, which costs money.
* Can donations are effectively randomized, which makes it harder to fit them into a coherent meal plan.
It's really hard to see how cans could ever be better than cash.
I assume when purchasing the foodbank can standardize and become much more effective. E.g. A family of 4 gets package type A, a family with a newborn gets package B, etc.
When dealing with donations you can't do any of that as every request is going to be a custom assemblage of food stuffs.
Also, as I've noted in a separate comment, the food banks themselves often sit outside grocery stores with shopping lists that can be comprised of 80% cans.
If they didn't want that food and would prefer money, it'd be a lot easier to ask for that.
That leads me to think that they do want the food, but also that you're probably correct in thinking that people aren't likely to donate at all if it's not food directly.
Sure. Where are you storing the cans in the interim? Who is paying for that warehouse space? Wouldn't it make more sense to just receive monetary donations which can be stored for free and converted into food when needed?
Please do not donate food that is past its marked best by date. You're wasting everyone's time and effort.
Best-by and sell-by dates are not a food safety date.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/wcm/connect/fsis-content/inter...
Exactly this. Properly canned (or otherwise preserved via cooking in a sealed vessel) food effectively has no end date, so long as the seal remains intact. It will taste largely the same (barring leached minerals or otherwise from the vessel), unlike frozen food.
I've certainly had some expired, but not especially old, cans pop. Took me a while to notice them, too (gross). The item was brand-name pureed tomatoes, stored in an environment that was probably warmer than it should have been (a cabinet above a refrigerator). I doubt there was anything wrong with the manufacture of those cans, I think they opened up because of their age, the temperature of their storage and the fact that the item inside was a bit acidic.
Truthfully, I don't know if inspecting cans for damage is really much more difficult than just checking the expiry date on the can. For a food bank it's undoubtedly a bit of a pain either way, compared to rolling in a pallet of new cans...
It'd be interesting to know how they make that determination. The food bank around here tells people not to donate expired items (and has once or twice shared photos of the truly ancient stuff people sometimes donate) but it just occurred to me that I don't know whether they automatically throw that stuff away, evaluate everything individually, or what.
If the canned food’s sell/best by was last month and it was pulled from channel because of that, it’s obviously perfectly safe.
I can see why those same charities might institute a rule about no expired goods from the general public, however.