How Disney Uses Technology To Control Crowds In Their Theme Parks
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
Experience Required:
Roller Coaster Tycoon 5+ years
It's interesting to me that although there's someautomation in here they're also obviously using mostly human dispatchers. So it's more like air traffic control than road traffic management (which afaik is mostly automated these days).I'd love to know if that's because humans are a better layer to the entertainers and other employees or because they require comprehensive oversight for machine decisions. Or maybe it's just cheaper to throw some Junior Imagineers at LCD screens and walkie-talkies than write the algorithms?
Why not just have all the boats going at all times (assuming there is a line)?
average Magic Kingdom visitor has had time for only nine rides - out of more than 40 ... In the last few months, however, the operations center has managed to make enough nips and tucks to lift that average to 10.
Maybe it's just me but raising that average by only 1 ride doesn't seem like a very significant improvement for all that effort.
If they just allowed a fewer number of people into the park on any given day, would the customers be more likely to return again? I wonder if more people would spend money while inside the park if it was less crowded?
I presume each boat has an overhead... extra handler(s) required, wear and tear on the boat itself, boats that are out on the water aren't able to be repaired...
Maybe it's just me but raising that average by only 1 ride doesn't seem like a very significant improvement for all that effort.
Micro-optimizations on a large scale lead to a macro-optimization, no?
If there are too many boats, then the people on the ride will have to wait longer after finishing the ride to get off.
Well... not the ones that are turned away. They'll be mad.
Maybe to balance the wait time. If everyone is constantly satisfied, then maybe they don't get the same gratification. Hype and wait builds tension that helps gratification.
Just In Time Entertainment
“Control is Disney’s middle name, so they have always been on the cutting edge of this kind of thing"
"Control" is only a bad thing when there are nefarious motives, negative consequences or a lack of options for those being controlled. People willingly submitting to the Disney bear pit lap it up (as I have in the past).
Social acceptability changes to fit technology, but lags behind innovators.
What I'm saying is that no one cares if it's manipulation - they want the Disney magic.