Nothing to lose... until the majority vote says to do something illegal or destructive. Even when George Costanza decided to "do the opposite" there was a logical explanation for it. I realize that's an example from fiction but I don't think it's valid to simply say "Why not?" -- it's not a reason but a statement of surrender or indifference to your own ability to make rational decisions.
They decision is taken on the options I give them. If I give an option that is illegal or destructive that’d be my stupidity