Alice and Bob: A History of the World’s Most Famous Cryptographic Couple (2017)
cryptocouple.com
cryptocouple.com
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_and_Bob#Cast_of_characte...
If their speculation, that the names are arbitrary, is true, why make so much out of it?
Compare with Smith and Jones, popular in philosophy.
Would also have been nice for the website to have supported https.
I'd like to add that the existence of a popular contemporary movie whose title is simply a list of names, half of which are the entirety of the names in question (said movie supposedly being a cultural touchstone for RSA's generation, the Boomers), makes the latter hypothesis the less likely one by default, in my view.
Also reminds me of this: https://xkcd.com/1323/
* Eve is a malicious eavesdropper.
* Mallory is malicious, and able to participate at will.
* Trent is the trusted third party.
* Victor is an independent verifier.
I use Alice and Bob all the time when writing socratic dialogues. But I switch the names around from time to time. Charlie is often Charlene, for example, mostly because I have very fond memories of a friend from my youth who was christened Charlene but insisted that everybody call her “Charlie.”
I would have loved to see some more examples of this, since I wasn't aware it was an issue. Speaking specifically to exclusion, I thought a lot of the foundational work in cryptography was done by women. Disappointing to hear about systematic exclusion and marginalization in this field.