This long article is mostly true, but it doesn't contain any strong reconciliation of science and religion. The author states, correctly, that there is a huge amount that science can't yet explain, and that effective scientists must not rule out any possibility prematurely. He then suggests that this idea can help make religion and science more compatible in one's mind, but not without so many qualifications and reservations as to demonstrate that even he doesn't quite see how it's possible, which it isn't.

Most "atheists" are, strictly speaking, agnostic (or "possibilian," the author's preferred term). No scientifically-minded person is absolutely certain that no god exists. That doesn't make belief in a god in the least bit scientifically justifiable. Nevermind belief in a particular god. Until evidence for the existence of any god is found, the only rational position one can hold is that no god exists.