To me it's even the single biggest reason to use Android over iOS as there's no full featured browser on iOS.
To me it's even the single biggest reason to use Android over iOS as there's no full featured browser on iOS.
Well, no. I don't want to use a browser that is developed by an advertising company, and I want to encourage the development of more than one web rendering engine. But yes, killing extensions would be a major regression in Firefox's usability.
... on an operating system developed by the exact same advertising company?
To be clear, not one of the Android devices I've purchased have ever had official support. I'm using a Samsung a8 at the moment.
I hope the custom rom community finds a better mechanism for providing better device coverage.
>No. The browser is not fully open source like open in open source. It is a common myth and misconception about Kiwi Browser.
>Damn, 1 commit and nothing else but keeps updating and releasing apks? Looked into the issues and scarcely seen replies.
>I think this repo is just to show that "hey, I provided the so-called source code (even though not fully open-source as said above) so trust me and install me" thing.
Kiwi was started as a fun+independent project, then more and more people asked access to some source to be able to develop their own hacks (new tab page, extensions, bottom toolbar, import/export bookmarks, AMP, etc) and they are shared when the devs ask politely.
At the end of the day, if you use Samsung, Kiwi, Fennec or Yandex, what matters is to understand why the developers are doing their project, what do they get from it (not necessarily money), and what are the influences around. The source-code is one indicator, and, unless you actually have reproducible builds (and only Fennec has them from all the mentioned browsers) you have to use your intuition.
F-droid does independent builds. Even if it's not reproducible, I trust them more than over some random developer.