I really don’t think this is as credible of a threat as you paint it to be.
Terrorists don’t go around killing people for banning them from forums.
Terrorists don’t go around killing people for banning them from forums.
> Terrorists don't go around killing people for banning them from forums.
It seems incredibly arrogant to assume that you know what terrorists will and will not do (especially when used as a rebuttal to someone expressing concern for real people who have been put in this situation).
I don't have any experience interacting with terrorists, but growing up in a poor education system in the southeastern U.S., I've witnessed my fair share of gang activity. I have seen incredible confrontation/violence erupt as a consequence of amazingly trivial actions.
It does not seem far fetched to me that an extremist group would possess the potential to respond dispraportionately to a perceived act of disrespect or aggression. Given the circumstances, it's hard to find a charitable interpretation of why you would suggest otherwise.
Agreed, but it’s not an issue because they’re going to get killed by terrorists. I’m objecting to the dishonest framing, not trying to argue that this isn’t an issue.
>It seems incredibly arrogant to assume that you know what terrorists will and will not do
Your assumptions seem at least as arrogant.
>I don't have any experience interacting with terrorists
I do
This isn't some sort of internet pissing contest with people you don't know and will never meet; that is literally any other online forum that I've seen. This is a forum to discuss issues with people who are interested in them. You are purposefully diluting the conversation, and for what? The lolz?
Go somewhere else with this crap
I’m not an argumentative ass because my opinion differs from yours, that’s all in your head.
>I do
Is it something you're at liberty or willing to talk about? Cause I'm intrigued.
In Syria I watched him wave around guns on skype for a couple of years until he was placed at the top of the US kill list and eventually got incinerated.
>made them understandably fearful of making a living
These fb moderators have much less to fear than a factory worker, taxi driver or a convenience store clerk.
The fb mods are vastly more likely to be killed in a traffic accident on their commute than to get targeted by terrorists because they banned someone.
How should such a fundamentally unreasonable fear be compensated? Seems to me that it’d be enough to just offer counseling to distressed employees.
This is kinda like being scared of a plane crashing on top of you, sure it’s possible and a scary thought, but ...
This is pretty weird though, all kinds of people regularly make far more impactful decisions than issuing facebook bans without having to hide their names.