Having a duly registered company with fake directors gets you nowhere without a bank account.
Having a duly registered company with fake directors gets you nowhere without a bank account.
The AML/KYC process was outsourced. The customer would go through the registration form, provide their details, and then we would hit up the third party AML/KYC API, which would come back with details on the additional information required.
We would then have to chase up the customer for this information (usually a picture of their passport/utility bill, that sort of thing) and provide this back to the third party handling AML/KYC, who would then give authorization to another third party to create the actual bank account.
The whole thing seemed ripe for abuse. After a bank account was created, at no point was the customer contacted by the third party to tell them a bank account had been created in their name. If I was malicious and knew somebodies address history, DOB and had a picture of their passport, I could create a bank account for them with a couple of API calls, and they wouldn't have a clue.
It used to be that to get a bank account you would have to physically go to the bank and meet a human being first, but we’ve moved away from that.
We were closely watched by, and regularly in touch with, the FCA who didn't have any problem with what we were doing.
For example one of the companies mentioned: https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/OC364391/filing-h... : the two "members" of the limited liability partnership are Marteza Alliance Ltd and Dorado Group Ltd, both Seychelles registered companies.
In the unlikely event of the government wanting to fix this, I frankly think they should (a) ban the use of LLP by anyone other than natural persons and (b) blacklist all the tax evasion jurisdictions entirely. They will never do the latter but might be persuaded to move on the former.
This would really hurt the online-only banks if it were true. I opened a (personal) Capital One account online.
Lots of branches in NY will be more than happy to open a bank account for you and give you a credit card if you have 1500-2000 US dollars.
https://www.eternitylaw.net/info/litsenzii/offshore-bank-lic...
http://www.bankinglicensing.com/how-to-purchase-a-bank/banks...
All those draconian AML rules on individuals make no sense in light of that.
It’s Unfair to say the least!
So let's say, somewhere in the chain of onwership there are some real unsuspecting people, possibly accounting agencies, managing real banking accounts. By the time you find them the money will be gone, the agencies will disappear, the occupants of the registered postal addresses will be different. You are going to need a lot of official inquiries in multiple countries to trace everything back to the source. It might prove to be almost impossible to do.
Or by the time you finish your investigation Putin himself will be gone.
Just recently I opened a secondary account with an app only bank. Other finance apps can simply use the API to help you keep track of your own spending, etc.
Of course immigrants may have additional hurdles with banking in the UK, I don't know.
Perhaps you misunderstood me or I wasn't clear - when I first got here, I tried to deposit a check into my account using another branch / office than the one I where I opened my account. I couldn't. It is not a matter of opening another account with _another_ bank. From the little I know of the banking system, things are or were not then, as wholly integrated as they were in the States. OTOH, the US is only now catching up to the rest of the world w/ Chip and PIN debt/credit cards....
Opening an account is indeed unnecessarily difficult for immigrants, and UK landlords can get away with anything due to an almost total absence of regulation.
If you submitted it for proof of address purposes and you have service from that utility in your name but with different consumption values, I would think it would not.
If you submitted it for proof of address purposes and you do not have service from that utility in your name, I would think it would be.
Except if the bank sells off a region (e.g. merges with another bank, but is required to sell off some operations for competition reasons), then you’ll end up following your home branch.
It used to be that the home branch would technically be responsible for verifying cheques, but i’m Sure that’s all centralized now too.
That hasn't been my experience for 15+ years.