For me Lisp was a lot of fun to learn and play with, but I dont think it had a chance to survive in modern production environment because:
1. Not typed
2. Absence of a proper package mechanism and package managers like cargo or npm
Your first point there seems weird, giving the growing market penetration of Python.
Umm... the long section on "Common Lisp: The language" describing the features of the type system disagree with you.
> 2. Absence of a proper package mechanism and package managers like cargo or npm
Quicklisp.
Custom data types can be defined
Data types can be checked,
Functions can be dispatched on the data type of the input parameters (see CLOS),
Variable types can be declared.
... so, Lisp isn't a "typed language"?
>Quicklisp is still in beta and is in no way even close to package managers like cargo or npm.
QL is already better than NPM and PIP. It says "beta" only because the author is modest; it already has years of releases and development.
Maven is a better package manager, though.