> 1. The UI is unappealing. I would prefer the default theme to be dark.
I'll see if I can add an optional dark mode.
> 2. Site layout resembles generic link aggregating sites with no real content, which discourages the viewer from exploring the site further.
I'm not really sure what changes could be made that would encourage users to explore. Could you elaborate?
> 3. The boxes with numbers stand out too much among the other content. Thanks to the fact that they take various amount of space depending on the number's length, it causes the entire list of articles to appear unaligned.
Yeah, this is a problem. I think maybe it can be partially solved by abbreviating 3,000 as 3k, etc.
> 4. I was not able to find a link from the main website to the credits link you have posted. Also, it is unclear how much the credits cost. The purchase page is only available once you register and log in. In my opinion that is not transparent at all.
Okay, this is something I hadn't even considered. Originally the entire credits pack actually required authentication to view but I changed that last minute. I'll see what I can do to make the pricing more transparent.
> In my opinion, the most reasonable way to cover your website's running costs is to ask for donations.
I have run websites in the past on the donation model. In my experience it hits a wall once you have more general web surfers on your site than power users. Reddit tried the donation model with a transparent meter that showed the sites costs each day but it eventually had to pivot to ads.