It just sucks out value due to stock market implementation.
Admittedly any contribution of HFT to economic success (other than that of the traders themselves, of course) is probably fairly marginal, but more efficient markets are probably a good thing.
Ultimately price is just a measurement of how many resources it takes to make something, with the currency added in as the medium of exchange. A product being cheap means it is now easy for us to make; the previous price of the now-cheap product will be taken up by a better product.
But it would definitely be nice for businesses in general and employment law to stop being obsessed with 40 hours as a magical number. Working 4 8-hour days, or 5 6-hour days, or 4 6-hour days should be just be an option by default.
(And wages have to stop stagnating relative to prices so that the premise of "cheaper stuff" actually happens in the first place.)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/06/26/the-a...
If we had a way to remove all oxygen from earth, require people to wear astronaut suits, in order to reduce 10ms off the speed for HFT, you'd have companies start sucking oxygen out of the atmosphere.
I think we all know the answer to that question, and if you know the answer to that question, you know the answer to your question:
To make fucking money (of course).