I suspect that “Southeast Asian” women observed had different religion than those where “fertility pattern of their parents” is preserved.
Not all religions have the same effect on the outcomes, ignoring that in the studies is misleading.
Not all religions have the same effect on the outcomes, ignoring that in the studies is misleading.
I guess it shouldn't be hard to conceive where Islamic parties start having a major voice in elections because of demographics.
Overall religion is secondary at best, but economically weak tribal/familiy social nucleus cultures vs established nation states that provide reliable social safety not just for relatives.
"It's the Economy, stupid", look at fertility rates of Saudi Arabi, Iran, UAE Poland vs Nigeria.
And what was found is that females from south-east Asia had a big drop in fertility whereas Turks continued to have large families, comparatively.
So, no, the above research specifically disproves your argument.
Not quite to the extent of some white European populations, sure, but very far from the "breeding like rabbits" image that politicians use to drum up fear among uninformed voters.
> the "breeding like rabbits" image that politicians use to drum up fear among uninformed voters
The fertility rates of muslim immigrants are far higher than the natives which will lead to a decisive demographic and political shift, which is what those politicians are talking about.