This shouldn’t even be a debate. The name is horrible in every sense that matters to gaining adoption.
At the moment I can only remember things getting worse because of marketing people. Same goes for most ux.
Being memorable and differentiating yourself is important to gaining adoption, The GIMP achieves this better than something generic like *paint. A rename may have it's merits, but it won't be automatically better.
Because of the correlation of "gimp" to "crippled".
The idea that people might be led to believe that it's a shitty editor.
The UX is shit, but for those who've masochistically gotten used to it, GIMP isn't half-bad.