I think you might be thinking of specific banks and shell company schemes in Panama and not what most people would describe as a regular bank.
I think you might be thinking of specific banks and shell company schemes in Panama and not what most people would describe as a regular bank.
That said, according to Forbes (https://www.forbes.com/sites/francescoppola/2019/06/30/the-r...), they'll comply with KYC/AML. I can't find a statement direct from Facebook on that, though.
Can Facebook comply with KYC/AML type regulations? Yes. But that I'm aware of, they currently don't do anything of the sort with all their users.
I think they can verify my identity without a copy of my driver license.
Due to P2P, and disbursements we do for Play developers and AdSense, we are heavily invested in KYC. And we have to comply with the regulations of all countries we do business in, not just the US.
Source: https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/faqs/Sanctions/Page...
Source: https://www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org/EntityDetails.aspx/COMPAN...; https://www.fincen.gov/msb-registrant-search
Banks requiring warrants is exactly my point.
The Libra text makes no mention of any safeguards with regards to law enforcement. On the contrary.
Warrants are issued all the time.
You're erroneously assuming that banks can detect all possible suspicious activity on their own.
You're right, that's probably not possible to begin with.
However, if a bank spots patterns, which don't smell quite right they are obliged by law to report it to regulators.
Another reason why Deutsche is yet again in so much hot water[1]. Essentially they refused to report suspicious activities, which was flagged by a compliance officer.
[1] https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/06/donald-trump-deutsch...