It’s interesting that this surveillance is banned in France because teachers and pupils have « a right to privacy »: https://www.cnil.fr/fr/la-videosurveillance-videoprotection-...
It’s interesting that this surveillance is banned in France because teachers and pupils have « a right to privacy »: https://www.cnil.fr/fr/la-videosurveillance-videoprotection-...
The literature list from this paper[0] might be a good place to start looking.
[0] https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137308863_4
I don't have any data or anything, but I think that brain development is not even complete until well after 12th grade in humans. In particular, I think the ability to self regulate is compromised.
So here's the thing, the people doing all this are child development experts, so they would know all about brain development. A lot more than myself. In a very real way, these guys have made it a policy to monitor children who they know very well will likely not change their behaviors due to being monitored. So you have to wonder if this is just more about attribution and the ability to justify punishments? Just administrators playing CYA?
"No ma'am. We know it was your son who assaulted that girl. Here's the video for your perusal."
"No son. We know you said so and so to that other student over there. Here's the video."
"No sir. That was definitely your daughter fighting over there. Here's the video."
Etc etc etc.
So in answer to your question, "No." Children will not change their behavior. Certainly not at the mean.
Welcome any corrections from any child dev experts on HN if I'm wrong about brain development in children.
But are they ? Do we have any indication that this is the case ? Those tech companies could just be after what they see is money and not be based on any science (as it’s often the case).
From Gaggle’s website: « You are invading my child’s privacy! Well, aren’t you? Most educators and attorneys will tell you that when your child is using school-provided technology, there should be no expectation of privacy. In fact, your child’s school is legally required by federal law (Children's Internet Protection Act) to protect children from accessing obscene or harmful content over the Internet.".
This is the worst straw man argument I have seen in a long time. You can prevent my kid from seeing porn without reading everything she does.
Well, that's true.
I guess I just assumed people would be doing all this in step with some theory or principles of child development that indicated that this would be effective?
Maybe I'm giving way too much credit.
12th grade is seriously lowballing it as well.
The human brain doesn't stop developing until well into our mid-twenties, and there is still some plasticity even after that.
You are right on the money, myelin sheath[0] development isn't complete until 25 - 30 years of age and is critical for executive function[1].
[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myelin
[1]https://www.verywellfamily.com/myelination-process-3288324
Is that the case?
Whether or not some rulebreaking will happen on-camera doesn't preclude the possibility that children do change their behavior while being monitored, nor prove that constant monitoring will have no effect on their psyche.