Hacker News Reader

Comment by dejaime | Hacker News Reader

What goes around, comes around. Stealing code is on Microsoft records, as a simple "Microsoft admits stealing code" search shows. One can only wonder how much code the company stole that did not come to public knowledge.

https://www.computerworld.com/article/2522017/microsoft-admi...

View on HN

Also many of the .wav files in Windows 98SE were edited with a pirated version of Sony's Soundforge, the metadata in the media files contained the Soundforge cracker's name.

These .wav files might be made by person who works under Microsoft contract, not necessarily directly employed by Microsoft.

Which, of course, makes it perfectly acceptable?

No, but if Microsoft asked for wav files, and a contractor delivered them, is Microsoft at fault if the contractor used a pirated editing software?

Liable? I hope so. And then they can pass the buck on.

Why would Microsoft be liable?

Do you check if your butcher has illegally bought his knife? Should you be liable, if so?

Hmm... you may be right. But on the other hand, is the steak licensed and copyrighted?

It's not, but metaphors and analogies only go so far :)

That sort of shit is relevant only to lawyers. A salaried sound designer could have lied to Microsoft just as easily. The nature of the offense isn't actually being changed in any practical sense between the two scenarios.

As far as I could research, I only found articles about Windows XP. Close enough. https://www.tomshardware.co.uk/pirated-software-used-to-crea...

Reply on news.ycombinator.com