> Mead and Bateson's work in South East Asia was the basis for the title of Deleuze and Guattari's Anti-Oedipus[1].
Being fairly familiar with Delueze and Guattari's _Anti-Oedipus_, I don't think it's accurate to characterize the Mead-Bateson link as foundational. To that point, the title of the work is "Anti-Oedipus" and the subtitle is "Capitalism and Schizophrenia".
Indeed, the Wikipedia entry to which you link makes no mention of "Mead" and mentions "Gregory Bateson" in a sentence including twenty-three other names, which notably does not include "Sigmund Freud" against whom Deleuze and Guattari are writing and whose work is the (anti-)basis of the title Anti-Oedipus.
Anti-Oedipilization is the formative root of Delueze and Guattari's schizoanalysis whose method is informed in its opening pages by Georg Büchners novella Lenz [0]
Quoting (excerpt of Anti-Oedipus page 1):
> A schizophrenic out for a walk is a better model than a neurotic lying on the analyst’s couch. A breath of fresh air, a relationship with the outside world. Lenz’s stroll, for example, as reconstructed by Buchner. This walk outdoors is different from the moments when Lenz finds himself closeted with his pastor, who forces him to situate himself socially, in relationship to the God of established religion, in relationship to his father, to his mother. While taking a stroll outdoors, on the other hand, he is in the mountains, amid falling snowflakes, with other gods or without any gods at all, without a family, without a father or a mother, with nature. [1]
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenz_(fragment)
[1] https://medium.com/@mdowns1611/commentary-on-d-gs-anti-oedip...
EDIT: fix citation