> The authors say they have no intention of minimizing the very real problem of serious domestic violence — the classic male batterer. The survey did not cover the use of knives, guns, choking, or burning, and it was not concerned with the kind of situation that can drive a woman to seek shelter outside the home.
The view of the authors is that most intimate partner violence should not be equated with severe battering. Domestic disputes that turn physical because of retaliation and escalation do not have the same causes or the same consequences as male battering. Couples counseling is generally regarded as ineffective for batterers, but if the violence is moderate and the injuries are minor, both partners are involved, and they want to stay together, it makes sense for a therapist to work with both of them.
https://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletter_article/In_Brief_D...
The article's own summary suggests against making the kind of conclusions the article you linked to makes.
> If you are speaking historically, surely you are not suggesting incarceration of men as reparations for things we didn't do?
Not even slightly and it's an absurd reading of my post to suggest that I am.