Reducing Wasted Food at Home
epa.gov
epa.gov
One way to reduce waste would be to stop subsidising agriculture on a global level. This might be also be accompanied by raising the price of fuel and electricity. Before screaming bloody murder and downvoting, please consider the following:
- roughly 50% of food in the US goes to waste [1]. Meaning you already pay double what you think you pay. - About 40% of people in the US are obese [2]. We're eating too much. - Modern agriculture is an environmentally destructive practice [3]. Reducing food consumption can reduce its environmental impact. - We have all become used to abundance - in practically all domains of life: water, food, energy, travel, communication. We have become desensitised to the real value of things, we have no conception of the externalities involved in producing them, and pass our lives on an infinite binge of blind consumption.
On a personal level, each of us can make the transition to consuming food in a more reasonable and sober manner. Finally, educating people about food waste is not enough. What's needed is rather a coordinated effort to move to a new model where people consume what they physically need, rather than indulging momentary craving.
[1] https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/07/america... [2] https://web.archive.org/web/20190629233657/https://www.cdc.g... [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_impact_of_agricu...
I think sugar is far worse than caffeine including alternatives like Stevia. Decaf on the other hand depending on how it was made into decaf can also be harmful.
Kick the sugar first. I replaced it with tarts like green apples and other fruits and not only lost weight but artificial sugar does not even taste good to me anymore.
On a side note I'm never typi g from a mobile phone again I'm sick of.typos and I'm done fixing them from here, this mobile phone bottleneck is terrible.
Typing on a mobile phone is still really bad. I'm not just being a "old person". Key boards are way better, and I'm surprise that we have not had much innovation in this relm.
It's almost like the powers that be, want to keep mobile and tablet as consumption devices and not a creation devices.
It's really hard to produce meaningful data with a phone...
Basically bottlenecked from keyboard and mouse, to just mouse...
This is true but without explaining the issue. Gary Taubes compared it to asking why a theater is over capacity, and getting the answer "because more people entered than exited." Well, yes, but why?
You're at a healthy weight because you don't eat more calories than you need in a day. I'm obese because I do. But those facts don't explain why you don't and I do. It probably isn't because you count calories more diligently.
It isn't that you eat too many calories, its that your body hoards to many. Chronic exercise "helps" in the short term, but just causes long term damage, and your body just makes you want to eat more in response.
The trick is not how much you eat, but what you eat. Same with carbs, not how much, but what. Stick with nutrient dense foods (which pretty much means whole, fresh, goods, despite how much that is associated with a certain crowd), and your body just finally lets go and lets you lose weight.
For me, I went strictly Paleo for a year, not even low carb. Over a year and a half, I went from 340 to 183. I made sure I didn't decrease caloric intake (~2000 calories a day), nor increase caloric burn. According to common (but woefully incorrect) knowledge, I'm clearly lying, and I still weigh 340, yet, I don't.
Stripping out grains, refined sugars, dairy, legumes, refined oils, other refined products, and replacing it with fresh meat, vegs, moderate fruit, coconut and olive oil, while not decreasing calories, still helped me lose weight.
Healthcare sets people up to fail and then blames the victim. Its nuts.
It is true that metabolism varies by individual, and it's also an unfortunate truth that people who were obese and get their weight down to a level that the medical community deems healthy will have a slower metabolism than most naturally skinny people. But there is no chance that you were maintaining a 2000 calorie diet before you started losing weight.
What is also true is that most people do not properly estimate the number of calories they consume each day. I certainly have a hard time doing it - the only real way is to prepare all of your food yourself, or buy prepackaged food that you can measure accurately. I guarantee you were eating much more than you thought you were.
I don't have a reference handy, but I have read studies that show that when people self-report calorie consumption from memory they tend to underestimate by a large margin, reporting in the vicinity of 50-70% of actual consumption.
You can't get closer than 10% accuracy given that nutritional labels can be off by that much, and you aren't getting that unless you are making all your own food and weighing everything with a food scale.
A restaurant meal can vary by hundreds of calories based on how much dense fat like oil or butter is in it, and look identical each time.
Beverages alone are one of the major sources underestimated calories. A 20oz bottle of soda with sugar is multiple servings, but people don't think about it as such. The same goes for fruit juice and a lot of the fancy coffee beverages. Alcohol is also easy to underestimate, especially if a glass of wine with dinner can turn into half a bottle or more, or a nightcap turns into a double.
Nobody is arguing that we aren't learning more about weight and nutrition, but that doesn't mean we ignore science for personal anecdotes that are likely untrue.
In a way, its sorta like how flat earthers and anti-vaxers work, you're just part of a third type that denies nutrition science. I did exactly what I said I did, and so have many other people, and what you're engaging in is an odd form of fat shaming (seeing as I'm not fat anymore, but used to be; and lost my weight entirely by following the science where it lead me).
- the time of the day you eat it (you will more likely store things if you eat it late than early in the morning due to your homonal cycle)
- the duration on which you eat it (the infamous 9 hours popularized by dr rhonda patrick)
- what you mix. Eating the same amount of calories in pure fat, or in a mix of 50% fat and sugar will not result in the same process by the liver.
- insulin sensibility. Which is influence by the quality of your food. E.G: how much sugar it contains.
- ability to process said food, again influenced by the state of irritation of your intestine and your microbiome, and hence influenced by the quality of your food. E.G: adult can get irritated intestines by intaking dairy product after they lost their childhood ability to proess it as well.
I know it's a convenient shortcut to say "calories in, calories out", especially since it's easy to demonstrate (the anecdotal Twinkie diet made us all think). But if we keep repeating that, we are not helping people to lose weight. Dieting has a very low success rate because of the solely focus on the calorie count, while using the informations above as well lead to less rebound and frustration in my experience.
I'm also not aware of any study (though I haven't looked very hard) that shows intermittent fasting results in greater energy consumption (and hence lower fat gain / greater fat loss) except by making it somewhat easier to eat less.
[1] https://freetheanimal.com/2018/02/taues-peter-strikes.html
For example, adding an apple between meals helping women to lose weight.
Humans do not eat corn, wheat or soy in coming out of current production levels.
Second of all, subsidizing foods that people don't want to eat is inefficient since people, amazingly, won't eat it. So now you have a lot of food that you need to dispose off. You can't just make less of it because then it won't be there in case of an emergency. So you're almost literally throwing money into the dumpster.
If you grew beans, the best protein, calorie per externality (smallest energy required to grow), then you could store it, subsidise it and be really safe with that choice.
There is no national security in growing energy expensive foods. If you can't input the energy required to grow it, you're going to need to subsidise it even more in times of crisis. It's just plain simple stupid strategy and is not robust, not antifragile, it's fragile ridiculous strategy.
Luxury foods are subsidised because of insane lobbying. That's the only reason. No bean farmer is going to ask for subsidies given that his current demand is no where near beef.
Farmer that is working for Tyson Foods is going to ask for subsidies because the business model of Tyson Foods is made just to extract more money from government.
Developing multiple lines of trade helps guard against the hostile exporter, but we should be asking why they are hostile in the first place.
The best thing we can do for our agriculture is to allow the free market to allocate land, labor, and capital to their best and highest use, which is probably a lot different than the use allocated to them by lobbyists, cronies, and bureaucrats.
The majority of ag subsidies are not given to farmers for growing things. Crop insurance is subsidized, but that doesn't necessarily lead to overproduction as is only really kicks in when conditions are very poor. Conservation programs (to NOT farm land) are also subsidized. This again doesn't encourage over production.
There are many things that could be improved in modern agriculture, but my view is that subsidies have little to do with our largest problems.
There are other hidden subsidied, such as tarriffs on sugarcane meaning most fructose in the us comes from corn. A tarriff on a competitor is economically the same as a subsidy.
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/dairy-subsidie...
https://qz.com/944630/the-us-government-program-behind-the-g...
Their subsidies are in things like the farm bill where they are protected by tariffs and our weird obsession with pasteurization. Our dairy industry does a bunch of exporting milk powder to the 3rd world.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/bethkaiserman/2018/12/30/farm-b...
Does the obesity really come from eating too much? Or does it come from eating with disproportionate amounts of fat and sugar? Also, I think you can factor in things like how the people in the US need to drive much more than people in other countries because everything is so much further apart. It's not as practical to walk.
Food science is difficult: this seems to create an environment where people make up, spread and strongly hold on to assertions that aren't evidence based.
TJ's frozen Brussels sprouts at 99 cents for 16 oz are a winner.
Now we buy maybe 2 or 3 days worth of food at a time and our fridge basically just has raw ingredients and a few condiments in it. Usually a package of never frozen meat (beef or chicken mostly) and a few fresh veggies and mushrooms for side dishes (many of them keep well or even better outside of the fridge). The most prepackaged thing we eat these days is on pasta night, and that's just for the sauce out of the jar and some premade noodles. The rest of the sauce is fresh chopped veggies and it makes a delightfully chunky sauce. A favorite side dish is mashed squash in lieu of mashed potatoes.
It takes time to cook a nice meal, and if it's possible to get the time (it's not easy!) I think everybody should do it. The frozen and bulk foods never resulted in a meal half as good. One nice side effect, if we increase the portions a bit, we get a quality packed lunch from the left overs.
Our meals also have dramatically increased the volume of fresh vegetables and are definitely much more healthy than anything we used to eat. Are we trying to reduce waste? Not really, just trying to cook and eat better, but the side effect is great (and much cheaper as well!) It's also a nice change in daily routine to stop at the grocery a couple times per week.
Our fridge went from slam packed full to mostly empty and we eat far better.
From experience cooking daily for 8 people is not that much worse than for 2 people, it's just a different kind of project both have hurdles and highlights. Not going to lie, being able to take time off each day to take care of your kids really did help with time but it mostly it was to socialize and being less of a eat-work-sleep machine.
Ordinary day now is, breakfast 0600-0730, work things 0730-1630, cook and take care of kids 1630-2100, other things 2100-~0100.
But it is a little insane that we have built a society where most cannot afford to take an hour to prepare and enjoy a meal, yes.
In France, as recently as a couple decades ago, it was common for people to leave work at 12p, pick up their kids from school, have lunch at home, bring them back at school at 1.30p and be back at work at 2p. But that’s been quickly going away with increasing work hours, increasing distances between home/school/workplace, etc.
"I don't have this problem, people who do must be doing it wrong" is not a very productive attitude to have for a hacker.
"I don't have this problem, but I'm going to find out how the life circumstances of the people who do differ" is a little more constructive.
What are people prioritzing above getting a good meal, if it is getting money for any food at all then it's easy to respect.
When going to the grocery stores in the US, I never had to think “Will I have enough space to fit all this food?”, which actually resulted in buying a lot of stuff that wasn’t always needed (eyes are bigger than stomach at the supermarket).
In Amsterdam, shopping trips were more frequently needed, but the food that was bought was also smaller in amounts and less weight, so it wasn’t that big of a deal in the end, and less food ended up being wasted.
(Having to bike or carry food by hand is also a bigger incentive to carefully plan resources vs. loading up the entire trunk of a car). :^)
Growing your own food is not a hobby, you are literally participating in the economy.
It is great exercise and really helps you understand just how much labor and time goes into making food from seed to harvest to storage and consumption.
I feel like there is a growing movement of more and more people trying to relearn these skills.
As for food waste, the way I compost kitchen scraps is to dig a 1-2 foot deep by 1 foot wide hole in my yard where I dump a week's worth of scraps into. I chop it with my shovel and bury it while chopping. In 1-2 months time it will be completely taken in by the soil life.
I use a 5 gallon bucket with a lid that seals in the kitchen to collect scraps.
Each year I pick a new place to dig my holes. I keep the holes about a foot apart and I remove rocks as I go.
They next year I plant a crop in the location.
I like this method of composting because it enriches the land and the soil life does most of the work without any smell.
I'm slightly tilling, preparing, enriching, and de-rocking(?) My land over the course of months. It takes about as much time as emptying the trash.
You end up doing a lot of work, but it doesn't feel that way because you are "eating the elephant one bite at a time".
> Filburn argued that since the excess wheat that he produced was intended solely for home consumption, his wheat production could not be regulated through the Interstate Commerce Clause. The Supreme Court rejected the argument and reasoned that if Filburn had not produced his own wheat, he would have bought wheat on the open market.
Good ol' Interstate Commerce Clause strikes again.
I don't think hobby means "something that is not part of the economy".
Having to plan out what I needed for the week really changed my behavior for the better.
(+ supporting local farmers + reducing plastic consumption)
plus stopping daily meant I could more easily vary my eating
Since I didn't choose what food I'd get and they design the shares for a family not just one person, it forced me to use new foods and learn what grew near me and barely go elsewhere. The experience taught me a lot about how to see plants (and fungi) and prepare them.
Trying to plan for the week and shop for it on one day is the cause of most of our food waste, because we inevitably change plans (voluntarily or involuntarily).
We are actually trying to be better about going to the store more frequently and buying less in advance. We are also trying to actually use things we stockpile in the pantry, since we also have a problem with stocking canned and dry goods we forget about.
Our run is about 20'x30' with a 8'x4' coop in one corner. The perimeter of the run has a 6" post every 6' that stands 10' high. The top of all the posts are connected by a metal wire. On this wire we have plastic fencing (same gridded stuff that is used for construction, but dark green instead of construction orange) for the "roof" of the run. The sides are two types of fence. From ground to top is chicken wire fencing. This is strictly to discourage the hens from getting out. And the bottom 5' has very thick gauged wire fencing as well, which keeps predators out (though living in the downtown of a city that is just dogs really, and most dogs around us don't care because lots of people have chickens where we live).
The compost system is setup so that there are four, 4'x4'x4' compost areas next to one another (constructed with pallets). Every three months we change which compost pile gets new material added to it. We mostly let the chickens do all the work of turning, and once a week we just go and throw everything back into the pile. It takes about 12 months for a pile to be ready to go, so we get a new 4'x4'x4' pile of compost every three months or so (I said 3 month turn around in my previous post, I was thinking of every three months we change piles, not ready compost every three months).
Because we take so long to compost and because we have chickens that do much of the work of digesting, we compost everything we can. Normal stuff like vegetables and leaves, but also all our food, including bones and meat and sugars. There is a deer carcass in one of my piles right now, by the time we dug out that pile most of the bones will be dust, the skull will be pretty much the only thing left over.
We never see any issues with bad germs in our compost because we let it cook so long and let the chickens eat the stuff that most people say not to compost (and birds have titanium stomachs).
We use old and bad hay/straw from my wife's clients (she's a farrier and horse trainer) as the "browns" in the compost, which makes up the bulk of the matter in there.
People (myself included) get carried away buying stuff, even groceries. Without planning you will quite easily blow past your budget and then stuff will sit in your fridge and rot.
Or another scenario: you buy a bunch of groceries and then eat fast food all week and throw most of your groceries away. Gotta use what you bought or it will go bad.
It's very easy for a family of 3 in the US to spend $2K/mo on food and throw most of the groceries away. If you drive that down to $1K/mo, you can eat pretty well, and there won't be much wastage.
If I were to be more honest with myself in a store, I’d cut down on food waste. My problem is I see certain things, and think to myself, oh I’ll eat those. But in reality, only ideally I’d eat those. What ends up happening is I get hungry and look into the fridge for something to eat, only to see that exact thing staring me right in the face before I say, damn nothing to eat.
As well, going to the store more often. Buying only a couple or three days worth of groceries makes it easy to lower food waste. When I try to buy over a weeks worth of groceries I find myself having to throw away things more often.
Exact opposite is true for my family. If I meal plan and shop once a week, we eat everything because everything was bought for a specific purpose. If we are more loose with it, we buy too much, and end up throwing out stuff. Of course, you could meal plan for 2 days or 3 days and also go to the store that often, but that seems like a complete waste of time. Save for the occasional spontaneous idea, or for things that can't keep for a whole week, meal planning and shopping once a week have cut down our food-budget and waste significantly. Of course, learning to buy the right amounts for a whole week takes a while. A couple of weeks at least.
When I was reading the Mr. Money Moustache blog some time ago, one of his first advices was to cut food spending, saying that "you don't need to spend $1k/mo on food with these few tricks". And I was completely baffled by these numbers. I spend €300/mo on food ($340), and that includes eating out at restaurants nearly every workday for lunch, something that I plan to stop.
(Now, granted, Germany is a cheaper place to shop for groceries than the US from what I've heard, but still, wtf.)
Other things that drive costs up are buying 'healthy' prepared foods like fresh breads, using a bread machine I pay 0.45/loaf of whole wheat, 0.60 for rye bread. It takes ~15 minutes in the morning to prepare and set the machine,compared to 6-10 per loaf for good quality bread. It isn't necessary to spend copious amounts of time in the kitchen to eat well, I typically spend 0:30-1:00 cooking, and we eat leftovers 2-4 nights per week. For instance, soups are often cheaper & easier to prepare in large batches. I don't want to eat the same meal for a week straight, but servings can easily be frozen for later. As a bonus, these frozen meals can then be served when there isn't enough time to cook a meal.
Where I live it costs about 40-60, depending on the restaurant, to eat out once, and a single trip to a grocery store is rarely less than $100 (and that's not enough for a week).
I tend to classify eating out in the entertainment budget, so eating out once will mean not going to a movie. I did this when I noticed I was spending 500/month for lunch at work. Having to make the conscious decision to sacrifice a fun activity helps to put this in perspective.
It seems in any given pack of fresh blueberries/strawberries/brocolli/whatever, inevitably some part of it gets moldy or subpar eating conditions. With the freeze dried equivalent, I know I have as-good-as-fresh ingredients that won't spoil anytime soon. I don't see myself ever buying fresh berries or brocolli or chicken ever again now that I've discovered freeze dried foods. It's just too efficient and convenient to have all these good quality foods on-demand that virtually never spoil.
Edit: well actually I'd still buy fresh food... If I had my own freeze drier and freeze-dried them myself!
I'm personally very conscientious of my food usage and throw little away, but the EPA telling the consumer this is their problem is irritating.
That was my first thought when I opened the website. I kind of expected to see the answer to this on the site, not a tip this general, or maybe a reference to look it up.
And it’ll stop all the plastic waste too.
But I understand it will be a supply chain nightmare
I'm not sure why? It's standard practice in UK supermarkets, although prepacked bags are also available.
I was referring for the US (or maybe the biaised vision I have of it)
I think I easily save 20-50% when I buy the amount I can eat before it goes bad instead of having to buy a larger amount because it's prepackaged in a too-big-for-me package.
Come to think of it, I never throw out stuff like fruit which I buy "per piece" instead of prepackaged, where as carrots which usually only comes prepackaged where I shop is something I often have to throw out of because the last ones have gone bad before I got to them. This have meant I rarely eat carrots anymore and instead buy something else that isn't prepackaged.
Same thing with bread actually. But then they started selling smaller breads all over the country to combat food waste, and it really has, I don't remember throwing out bread in the last couple of years.
And yes, I do eat plenty of vegetables. I follow a whole-food plant-based diet and have done so for almost 7 years.
Carrots and all root veg will easily keep for a couple of months or so if you store them in the fridge. Make sure they're completely dry, don't wash - they keep better - and remove any sprouting tops, then keep in an air tight box or bag, or as second best, just in the non-ventilated drawer of the fridge.
Or about as long in sand if you have a cool dry cellar or garage to serve as makeshift root cellar. Store flat in plastic trays or tubs covered with dry horticultural sand or soil.
Also, I believe parents generally don't teach kids to respect food. It probably starts by letting a toddler feed him/herself too early and in the process normalizing food wastage.
There is also a first world etiquette of leaving some food in the plate. I have seen people habitually do it.
I think it’s a status thing, to show that you are rich enough that you can just throw away food. You have probably heard or seen the horror stories about (rich) Chinese tourists and buffets when they visit overseas.
OTOH My friend majorly pissed off our (normal for China) dinner host in southern China by putting food on his plate then not eating all of it.
It’s the same in Japan, and Japanese buffets literally fine people for taking food and not eating it.
I'd say its a politeness/not appearing greedy thing, certainly from a food in the centre of the table point of view. Drives me mad when at the end on a dinner party you have one potato, one carrot stick, one chunk of bread.
This is from a UK point of view, I understand there are different motivations elsewhere.
Of course our meal serving sizes do probably vary more than in most (saner) countries. On the low end of the dining-out spectrum, one is often served enough food for two or more meals. There's an "if I don't feel stuffed to the point of nigh-immobility, I got ripped off" attitude in that sector of the market.
Really? Growing up in the US the usual pressure was to clean your plate, either to avoid offending your host or to not waste food. I have seen this cited as a possible contributor to obesity and unhealthy relationships with food here.
Parents use the argument about poor kids in Africa (at least my parents did) but that makes no sense. If I eat less, the banana doesn't magically appear on the plate of a poor family. There are only a billion people left in extreme poverty despite the recent (100 years) population explosion, and with some effort, most of them will soon have enough food, too. But reducing waste won't help; buying less would help. So instead, the parents should be berating themselves for getting the portion size wrong and having bought too much, instead of teaching kids to overeat and what a sin it is to leave food on the plate.
It's very hard to change these beliefs and habits, I'm curious what your thoughts are on this after reading my reasoning (which is by no means perfect, I might be wrong or explaining it wrong).
Storing things the right way is important, but much more important is not buying too much. My solution is that I never use a shopping cart but my own bag. When you have to carry it you will have a much better feeling if it is too much.
This is ofc harder if you have kids.
Bea Johnson's family of four produces less than a mason jar of trash per year. https://www.youtube.com/user/ZeroWasteHome
Not speaking to atoav in particular, but it's tempting to make excuses why we don't do what others do that we want to but aren't. If we look for role models instead of excuses, we motivate ourselves to reach more of our potential.
In her case, reducing the waste seems to have brought her family together more. It doesn't seem to be a burden, just a one-time shift.
That zero waste thing seems to be her job now.
Man, this topic really brings out the normally hidden mommyblog capacity of HN. Everyone with their weird anecdotes and misinformed two cents. Someone in these comments said they were 340lbs on 2,000 calories per day, etc, etc. I can't stop reading.
I compost (feed my soil) spoiled food. There is no waste in that type of closed loop system.
I also have kids and it's hard. Don't beat yourself up just get a tiny bit better each day.
Living in this country is hard when it comes to seeing the ignorance to waste. I'm sure people will wake up eventually.
ps: also, who made a kind of compost bin to at least avoid bagging organic material to go into the recycling system ?
Wasted food in the home though is mostly a cultural/price issue, as well as a misalignment issue between seller and consumer. Grocery stores try and increase AOV by selling you a 3lb bundle of carrots because they believe it to be profit maximizing to do so, at the cost of deadweight loss borne by the customer if they don’t eat all that they buy.
Lettuce? Id struggle to eat 3lb of lettuce before it went off.
Leafy vegetables can be thrown into a stir fry or soup and kept a bit longer after being cooked. (Same principle: eat fresh at the beginning).
That 3lb is 90% water anyway.
I remember it was a Twitter rant
Usually I use a store-bought broth or soup mix, but the other 3/4 is stuff that may soon go bad, but will survive another extra week after a good boil.
But I get that not everybody has that opportunity.
I think there needs to be more radical solutions. For instance a sugar tax or a different tax band for microwave ready meals.
We have all been there, after a hard week to have gone shopping to get the healthy veg and some ready prepared meal items, e.g. microwaveable or just a pizza that can be shoved in the oven. We get back tired from the shopping trip and don't make that salad, we put the pizza in the oven. The next day we do the same. Then the working week takes over and that once prime condition veg is not looking so good. We can't bring ourselves to throwing it out so we hold on to it until it is truly rotten. Meanwhile we have some other lazy beige foods.
It is an easy trap to fall into and we have all been there. But what if that instant pizza cost as much as a restaurant pizza? Or that microwave meal cost the same as a pub meal?
You would probably go for proper food. People could reduce food waste in the days before refrigeration, to not waste a thing. Ask anyone who is old enough to have known WW2. Rationing was a way of reducing waste, but, what else has changed? The junk food. This needs to be taxed so that people don't leave the good stuff to go rotten. Junk also needs to be taxed so poor people who view vitamins as a luxury don't eat it.
> Make your shopping list based on how many meals you’ll eat at home. Will you eat out this week? How often?
> Plan your meals for the week before you go shopping and buy only the things needed for those meals.
> Include quantities on your shopping list noting how many meals you’ll make with each item to avoid overbuying. For example: salad greens - enough for two lunches.
> Look in your refrigerator and cupboards first to avoid buying food you already have, make a list each week of what needs to be used up and plan upcoming meals around it.
> Buy only what you need and will use. Buying in bulk only saves money if you are able to use the food before it spoils.
Great list. We keep a wiki page on our server that contains "menus" for the week along with the shopping list. We are able to rotate those every couple of months (ie: we have a couple months worth of menus that we rotate through) and it is just grab the list, check the pantry/fridge for what we have and get what we need from the store. Super easy.
Recipes do get tired, so we do rotate those out and some new ones in, but the above is the general flow.
We eat reasonably healthy. We can maximize our spend by looking for deals. We don't have to expend too much effort planning now.
That way, you buy exactly what you need.
You also know when you're going to need everything, so if there are any short-lived things (cut herbs, for example) that you need for a meal later in the week, you can get them just in time.
And any chicken meat waste goes to the local magpies so they won't bomb us.
I wonder: my neighborhood has some common area that I could ask that we set aside for composting. Have anyone on HN ever setup a neighborhood compost? Any tips/suggestions?
In fall, there are also solutions for fallen leaves, but I don't remember what (we've lived here less than a year, I vaguely remember reading it but I've yet to see it). In the Netherlands, they put collection baskets (of like 1x1x1m) on many streets in that season.
That being said, I would have to think that reducing the amount of waste that you create in the first place will have a bigger impact than reducing the volume of a given mass of waste.
Of course, if you fill your yard with nothing but squash plants and harvest a ton of squash every fall, that's a bit of an extreme counter-example because you're not likely to eat that much squash, but even then you're going to give it away or sell it at the local farmer's market.
But for the average food grower/amateur homesteader, you'll gradually develop a self-adapted menu of homegrown foods which you will be very pleased to consume as soon as they are ready, free of nasty chemicals and ripeness inhibitors, and full of nutrients that have not been lost in the production, transportation, and storage phases that commercial produce must necessarily undergo.
You will eat locally grown produce that is adapted to your region, when and if it comes to maturity, and waste will not be your main concern, but rather the opposite -- if you have 12 potato plants, and they each produce 5-10 potatoes in August, you will accommodate the bounty by building a rack in the basement to store them over the winter -- literally a root cellar, which is what basements were originally for.
Plus, it's fun, and vastly educational for children. Nothing is more satisfying than having your child help build the raised beds and plant the seeds, then seeing the seedlings come up and develop into mature plants that provide bounty for the dinner table. Experiencing the full cycle also encourages them to eat their vegetables. Raising egg chickens is also highly fulfilling and rewarding.
Lawns are largely wasted in our society. When I visited Hungary a couple of decades ago, newly freed of Communism, every back yard had a garden, a chicken coop, as well as larger farm animals such as pigs and goats. Sadly, this level of self-sufficiency has probably diminished as their society has developed and moved to the Western model of centralized food production and distribution.
Growing your own food means next to zero waste, and what clippings and husks and greens remain after the harvest are recycled into the compost bin or straight into the bed. If you have chickens, a lot of this material, such as tomato skins, carrot ends, etc., are eagerly devoured. In return for your generosity, the chickens provide high quality fertilization of your yard and garden, and as a bonus they eat insects including ticks.
At my local supermarket, I can buy a single onion if I'd like. If I want a them pre-bagged, it's a 3LBs bag. At Costco, the option is a 10LB bag. 5LBs bags of mozzarella. 5LB and 10LBs bags of carrots.
It's a great place to shop, especially for large families/groups, but if you're a small household then it will lend towards over-buying, simply because you can't get a 1-2 person quantity of most things. This morning, I walked to the store and bought a single avocado. If I'd gone to Costco, I would've had to get a bag of five. (Which is surprisingly few for Costco.)
Here's a product list for Costco: https://queenbeecoupons.com/costco-price-list/ Compare the quantities with what I can get from my local supermarket: https://www.heb.com/