I’ve tried using TeXmacs once and it never really worked well. Maybe because I already can write LaTeX reasonably quickly, but using it always felt slow and clunky.
I’ve tried using TeXmacs once and it never really worked well. Maybe because I already can write LaTeX reasonably quickly, but using it always felt slow and clunky.
I was also using the software to do my own derivations. My handwriting is pretty bad so I actually preferred that to using a physical notebook.
Finally I did the typesetting of my whole PhD thesis with it. I had to split it in multiple files because at the type it would be very slow on very long and complex document but apart from that the result looked very nice.
As an aside, and this is just personal opinion, I always felt the love of latex in the scientific community is some sort of Stockholm syndrome. There is no arguing about the fact that latex is better than word for any serious writing and that the output is normally beautiful (if one chooses the right style, probably CV are the common exception) but the input method (let alone the conglomerate of tools/libraries around it) can be greatly improved. If latex notation is so good why then nobody uses it to write math on a blackboard? :) Texmacs (and lyx ) really bring something new to the table. What I think still remains to be solved is the topping to create new templates, right now it is a bit like working with raw css/html. I’m pretty sure something more intuitive could be built, something like the developer tools of chrome would already help.
Some people are using TeXmacs. But the number of the TeXmacs users are increasing.
> Now that you can export markdown and org-mode to LaTeX, TeXmacs doesn’t seem to provide much value.
This is not a difficult but a trivial task. Currently, TeXmacs documents can be converted to LaTeX. Some people use TeXmacs to write the draft of a paper and then polish it using LaTeX.
> I’ve tried using TeXmacs once and it never really worked well.
You may try it again. We have added plenty of features and fixed many bugs.
We could possibly have used TeXmacs, R markdown (especially with RStudio), some variant of noweb, or even Jupyter with conversion to LaTeX using pandoc.