Does that make it clearer?
There is no conclusion or resolution to what was introduced so I still can't fathom what you are trying to share. It feels like a situation where only half the thoughts hit the page and since we don't know the context we can't fill in the gaps.
Our issues are in the actual writing of the post, not as much what you are trying to say because we can't even get to that.
When desktops became popular in Sweden computers where rare in say South America.
Now computers are not rare in South America, which is good. The bad thing is that they are common in a consumption only format.
The problem is UI in particular text input. The solution use say gloves as input and VR systems which I predict will be cheaper and broadly available.
Until that happens a huge amount of people are stuck with smart devices, so I'd like to improve the situation. To get there I'm doing my work on a tablet to get a good idea on what works and what doesn't. Why? Because I want teenagers in the rest of the world to be able to have fun with computers as I did.
As a blog post for a random tech friend people follow, sure, that's fine. But I don't understand why this was posted to hacker news, and I don't understand why people voted it up.
Why: because desktops aren't widely available in the developing world
The "unrelated" link is a suggestion on how to write fast without a keyboard. Something that might come in handy for a non-desktop machine, don't you think?
[0] http://tbf-rnd.life/blog/2019/06/16/0-learning-curve-chorded...
So I'm looking into alternative ways of doing this.
The chorded input method is interesting in conjunction with say a all in one android VR-headset and haptic glove input, where you have all ten fingers.
What kind of software did you develop was it on a commercial basis or on open source projects?