Risk for Dementia May Increase with Long-Term Use of Anticholinergics: Study
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
I'm not against quitting but I'll be damned if I'm going to take my finger off a button that consistently provides me 8+h sleep and obliterates depression symptoms without being really circumspect about it. Also, no family history of dementia here.
Anticholinergics, the medicines in the article, have been suspected for quite a while, though proof has been lacking. Acetylcholine is a neurotransmitter, after all, and cholinergics improve brain function in choline-deficient patients. It would almost be surprising if they didn't cause some long-term mental effects.
Antihistamines clearly cause short-term sedation and 'brain fog', and are another short-term medicine which many people take regularly for years. I don't know of any equivalent study, but I've heard a number of doctors express concern.
Proton-pump inhibitors (i.e. acid reflux meds) are one of the most widely-consumed medications in the US. They've also been linked to dementia in several studies (which are contradicted by several others), and have much less disputed associations with gut bacteria changes that can lead to infection and gastric cancer.
Amphetamines (i.e. Adderall) are another obviously-psychoactive medicine studied over short/moderate terms, with primate studies suggesting increased Parkinson's risk at human dosages. This one is a special case, though, because the full risk seems to be incurred after even brief use despite the harms appearing much later.
Add to this the stack of worrying-but-vague results showing that many drugs alter gut bacteria, and implicating gut flora in everything from IBS to anxiety to Parkinson's.
It increasingly looks like we're running a whole-population study on ourselves, distributing medicines to millions of users with no idea what they do over a lifetime of use. I don't see an obvious cure for this - requiring decades of data before authorizing medications is both unethical and impractical. But long-term drug effects are a disturbingly good explanation for the rising frequency of a whole host of long-term diseases.
In short, take these kinds of observational studies with a grain of salt.
I personally find sleep, exercise and sunlight does far more. However I also understand not everyone is like me. Still, it's kind of crazy.
The Daily podcast is wonderful. The NYT isn't without fault, but they are probably the best media company in the US.
They do an awful lot of important investigative journalism, and I don't want to see what a society without such work looks like.
I DO subscribe to the Wall Street Journal, which is worth the cost to me. I'm a stock market junkie so there's that.
I guess people still see the WSJ and NYT on opposite ends of a spectrum. But while the ideological differences persist, I think the more significant difference these days is between reputable outlets and those that are not. On that axis, the WSJ and NYT are both fine, as are a few others.