https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/the-bacterial-horror-of-...
https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/the-bacterial-horror-of-...
They are terrible. Saving paper towels at the cost of spreading bacteria and giving everyone moist hands is not a good trade off.
The way they work is based on the idea of a narrow stream of air that gets water off your hands better. But for the stream to remain narrow and not dissipate, you have to get your hands close to the equipment. It's based on almost but not quite touching it.
Positioning your hands in a careful and controlled manner is, ergonomically speaking, an uphill battle. So on average, it won't happen often.
In other words, Dyson hand dryers kind of trap you into accidentally touching the part you don't want to touch.
Worse, the same applies to all the people who used the hand dryer before you. It's a very reasonable bet that the surface where the air comes out has been touched by someone who didn't use soap when they washed their hands.
I use these all the time (they’re pretty much everywhere in the U.K.) and haven’t experienced this unbalanced pressure issue. They always seem pretty much equal pressure on each side to me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExuvJkZ61Cg
With large hands, there's an extra degree of difficulty to avoid touching the sides and the bottom. It still leaves you with wet wrists and damp fingers.
Regardless of what common sense might say, the point is that the study didn't actually do a direct comparison.