In this case the desired functionality can be encompassed in a single standard library method.

However, the author of the code may have started with a much more complex implementation but still feels like `is_foolike()` is better at describing the _intention_ of the method than the eventual implementation.

Replacing the descriptive method name with the actual implementation may mean the author now feels that they have to append a non-functional comment to explain that in order to test for foo-ness one only needs to do a simple string-prefix match.