I interpreted it as "things I want to eventually add", and I already conceded that the author has some false claims (as the blog post points out as well).
Think of it as a roadmap / mission statement. It gives you a good idea if you want to use it when it is eventually ready. A small bit of marketing.
> I'm not sure what the "harmless" comments are about - the article doesn't mention anything about that (or the income) at all?
Zig's author has said they have been discouraged to work on their tech since they allegedly work harder and deliver more yet get less donations: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20230384 (which is a child of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20230351).
Several other people in this thread (and I think others if memory serves) have expressed displeasure that V's author collects donations.
That is toxic. People get donations for all sorts of stuff. Let them, and don't be bitter about it. The way the HN crowd seemed to latch onto V's author specifically was very peculiar for me to observe in the last several months.