In case the author ever reads this: assuming good faith, the effort and intent is laudable, but you've put the cart in front of the horse by having multiple amazing claims that would take many, many man/years to accomplish by experienced developers, which is why they've been received with a lot of skepticism. Even assuming a great level of skill, the claims a priori are hard to take serious, even before taking into consideration the timeline. Now that (part of?) the code has been released, it seems to be little more than a transpiler from V to C, with allowed inlined C, with most advertised features stubbed out. Had you been claiming "this is my target, very much in progress", then the response to them would be less adversarial and more in the line of "there are multiple reasons all of these targets are not necessarily attainable simultaneously". Had you done that, your Patreon would also likely not have a monthly ~1000 USD support either, which is a big part of why you are in the receiving end of online backlash.

I want to imagine that you just got way over your head, underestimating the effort needed to accomplish all of your goals, but at some point it takes a bit of naiveté to think that well-funded teams in other languages haven't tried to fulfill some of your goals before. I'm very much intrigued by the "Space required/Build time" table, particularly how you think the comparison makes sense or is fair in any way, as you're comparing compilers for established languages with extensive standard libraries, implemented and battle tested features and a decades of man/year effort to your solo project.

Looking at the project it is really hard to come away with an opinion that isn't one of "this is a joke", "this is fraudulent" or "this is a well intentioned inexperienced developer that has no idea how high the target they've set for themselves is". I hope that if it is the latter.