Hacker News Reader

Comment by nolok | Hacker News Reader

Given human nature, the ways laws and regulations are made, and the actual price of tap water in a developed country, I don't see this evolving into anything other than landlord figuring a way for their non rented places to consume enough water to pass the test. I'm happy for you guys if it's working, and maybe I'm too jaded, but I know this wouldn't work here in France, only make things worse.

View on HN

When designing the law, you just need to consider this possibility as a fraud, and then if you do this you are facing a huge fine or a prison sentence. That's how all taxes work.

Of course some people would still infringe law (#Balkany) but most would not.

I the special case of France: such a law would be really easy to apply, at or least it would without Macron's changes: as everybody living somewhere was paying the «taxe d'habitation», every house without anyone paying for inhabiting it is an empty house. And in practice, with the suppression of the «taxe d'habitation», cities could just raise the level for the «taxe foncière» and it would have the same effect as a taxe on empty houses, without any special work to do.

One of the widely available $20 garden watering timers that flushes water down the toilet.

I bet Melbourne already has entrepreneurs selling the installation of this "water surveillance solution" at value pricing: a fraction of the saved occupancy tax!

They also check whether the bond has been lodged at the govt authority (this is mandatory)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com