The source of V or any substantial V project haven't been released, and the author making inaccurate claims about the compiler (and taking donations on Patreon, by the way.) Why should we accept without skepticism that (closed source app) was written with (closed source language)?
000000010001dc30 g 0f SECT 01 0000 [.text] _f_1
000000010001eba0 g 0f SECT 01 0000 [.text] _f_10
00000001000219a0 g 0f SECT 01 0000 [.text] _f_100
[...snip...]
000000010004bae0 g 0f SECT 01 0000 [.text] _f_462
000000010002a430 g 0f SECT 01 0000 [.text] _f_463
0000000100037940 g 0f SECT 01 0000 [.text] _f_464
000000010001f2f0 g 0f SECT 01 0000 [.text] _f_465
0000000100020220 g 0f SECT 01 0000 [.text] _f_47
0000000100020240 g 0f SECT 01 0000 [.text] _f_48
00000001000202b0 g 0f SECT 01 0000 [.text] _f_49
[...snip...]
00000001000182a0 g 0f SECT 01 0000 [.text] _string_add
000000010001a110 g 0f SECT 01 0000 [.text] _string_all_after
000000010001a020 g 0f SECT 01 0000 [.text] _string_all_before
000000010001a090 g 0f SECT 01 0000 [.text] _string_all_before_last
0000000100019ef0 g 0f SECT 01 0000 [.text] _string_at
0000000100018540 g 0f SECT 01 0000 [.text] _string_clone
0000000100018aa0 g 0f SECT 01 0000 [.text] _string_contains
0000000100018610 g 0f SECT 01 0000 [.text] _string_cstr
0000000100019470 g 0f SECT 01 0000 [.text] _string_ends_with
0000000100018b30 g 0f SECT 01 0000 [.text] _string_eq
(I had to rewrite the reply because I later realized that the binary was packed with UPX, I should have thoroughly inspected strings. Sorry for inconvenience.)