First, I feel this is a hand curated list of results (same with most of the "this does not exist" stuff). That being said it is very good. Pretty funny quotes:

> You might not think that a mumford brush would be a good filter for an Insta story.

They are definitely leaking some of their training data. Many of the names in the article are real people (which is concerning).

Working on synthetic data generation myself[1], this is not at all surprising. It's also why we are basically living in a "post-truth" world...

https://austingwalters.com/the-last-free-generation/

What do you do when anything can be synthetically created?

[1] https://medium.com/capital-one-tech/why-you-dont-necessarily...