But how much you'd need to eat for a clinically noteworthy benefit is the question. That's what the follow-on studies are for.
In other words, no one would fund a penicillin trial if they thought people could get by eating moldy bread from GNC.
What criterion does the FDA use to distinguish a food-derived chemical that needs to be treated as a drug, from one that’s still just seen as an extract/essence of the food itself, and therefore can be treated as a supplement? It seems very opaque to me.
If Wikipedia is correct, we should start eating yellow raspberries instead; they offer about seven times as much of the compound this study is investigating the effects of. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urolithin_A#Dietary_sources