What? There's quite a bit of evidence, and an entire special counsel was appointed to investigate and litigate the evidence!
https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Muel...
Sections 2 and 3 are particularly relevant in this case.
The special counsel is an obvious stitch up which has achieved almost nothing aside from some irrelevant indictments, and which has produced no credible evidence of any conspiracy with Russia.
If your terms of investigation are just 'Russian interference', then you can classify literally anything which comes from a Russian as being 'interference'.
Is my post 'UK interference' in US politics? It's a joke. The entire world is laughing at the US over this.
No, no evidence was produced that Trump or his campaign conspired with them. But massive amounts of evidence was produced that Russia tried to influence the election.
The Skripal narrative is nonsense too. The whole story is a farce.
> No, no evidence was produced that Trump or his campaign conspired with them. But massive amounts of evidence was produced that Russia tried to influence the election.
Having preferred outcomes and posting memes on Facebook isn't a crime under any law - national or international.
Also, propaganda aside, Russia did certainly commit crimes when it comes to the US politics-targeted hacking performed by their GRU and SVR intelligence departments during 2016.
Are you able to excerpt a few sentences from sections 2 and 3 that you believe are the most compelling?