I think that the point is that being able to do what you did requires intelligence to accomplish.
"I'm not intelligent, I'm just able to see enough patterns in chess to defeat Carlsen"
"I'm not smart, I'm just able to solve algorithmic problems based on my vast memory and ability to map new questions to old solutions"
And then the practical concern arises- does that actually make anyone a better programmer, and benefit employers?
In fact, I'm not even good at solving leetcode problems that well so I wasn't able to get a job at the big N companies...although it did help with passing the interview at one of the smaller companies.