Do You Really Need Dark Mode?
wired.com
wired.com
For programming, it's not about how well you can perceive text, but about keeping your brain from entering the "I'm outside, let's perform physical activity" mode. Similarly, everyone wants to avoid this mode at night (eg Redshift).
Even visual art apps, which benefit from a well-defined whitepoint, default to a neutral grey rather than blinding white. If you enjoy flooding your eyes with light, you can always mount a spot light or even a strobe light above your monitor.
For coding I always use light text on dark background because dark background makes the syntax coloring more useful as more colors are available.
If someone earnestly prefers bright backgrounds, I'm not going to say they're wrong. But it feels like much of the "preference" here is due to deprecating dark backgrounds as "weird" plus then pure momentum, and articles like this one don't help.
It is absolutely an accessibility feature. It is critical for some types of vision impairments, and is also preferred by many people with dyslexia who are distracted by "white rivers" that appear in standard text (especially when formatted justified).
Calling this an "open research question" does a disservice to people who unquestionably benefit from and rely on dark modes.
I find OLED dark mode to be the best because there is quite literally no light coming from a large section of my screen.
Flux, which is usually stylized as f.lux, is a third party application that automatically tints your screen amber at evening. Some people use it to be able to fall asleep more easily after work.
Unfortunately Flux on iOS requires a jailbroken device and Apple decided to switch off Flux’s built-in pendant called Night Shift when colors are inverted. So I’m looking forward that Dark Mode works with Night Shift to give me that submarine mode on iOS.
It's like somebody just shined a flashlight right into my retinas.
Flipped back to dark mode in mere seconds. So yes, we really do need dark mode. :)