BIY: Believe It Yourself
automato.farm
automato.farm
Didn't expect some of the messages I'm reading here, awww, guys...
Automated Inference on Criminality using Face Images, Wu & Zhang, 2016, Arxiv.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.04135v2.pdf
Deep Neural Networks Are More Accurate Than Humans at Detecting Sexual Orientation From Facial Images, Kosinski & Wang, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2018.
https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/publications/d...
Scientists Have Created an AI That Judges You by Your Looks, futurism.com.
https://futurism.com/scientists-have-created-an-ai-that-judg...
When artificial intelligence judges a beauty contest, white people win, qz.com.
https://qz.com/774588/artificial-intelligence-judged-a-beaut...
Congratulations you made an intentionally racist computer program.
I wish I could get one of these as a gift! They are hilarious.
Other than that I enjoy that it's trying to pull some non-western traditions into an exhibit being displayed in Vienna.
But hey, satire is at its best when you have to squint at it for a few beats to tell that it's a joke. As long as they don't actually sell stuff like this with the same marketing, what's the harm?
The point of this piece isn't to fool "superstition believers", but to draw a comparison between black-box algorithmic governence and superstition.
You're reading a level of malevolent mischievousness into "subversive art" that I don't detect.
Vast swathes of the modern economy are no less superstitious than these toys.
At least, that is one thrust behind the piece.
> Subjective judgments and biased datasets can easily be turned into objective measures and potential truths, which will then be embedded in devices around us.
So you see, it's not intended to fool the gullible-vis-superstition, but to unfool the gullible-vis-technology.