Both are relatively easy to dabble in, both relatively hard to reach expertise.
Things like the inverted pyramid, sourcing and neutral voice will get you fairly far in terms of basic information relaying, but great journalists are specifically skilled at interviewing, data diving and other things tertiary to pen on paper.
In retrospect, I was never suited for journalism. I can write well, but that's not really a great (traditional) journalism skill. The finished product for hard news is fairly bland and paint by numbers. Anything else treads into entertainment-journalism and the kinds of things that have a bunch of people screaming "fake news." I call that Race-To-The-Bottom Journalism and it's very in vogue these days.
"AI-enhanced journalism offers a glimpse of the next knowledge economy" https://www.niemanlab.org/2019/06/droidward-and-botstein-can...
As a parallel, maybe journalists should pair with subject matter people (even subject matter generalists) rather than have them as “sources”. There are of course people who are great at both things (your Nate Silvers) but the whole process might be cheaper and more efficient if, gee, the New York Times would have a couple onstaff PhD economists (not star columnists) that sit in the newsroom trying to give shape to the facts about to be reported, side by side with journalists.
https://www.poynter.org/reporting-editing/2006/fifty-writing...
And it links to a book on the topic too.
> Roy Peter Clark... whittled down almost thirty years of experience in journalism, writing, and teaching into a series of fifty short essays on different aspects of writing
(disclosure: I am a former j-school professor)
Were you doing journalism for a web site?
/Degrees in journalism and communications (not to be confused with a communication degree)
I don't think this kind of induction training was typical - it was just put on by that particular company at that particular period. But it was very good. Shout out to the trainer who I still remember 30 years later. You were excellent Tim https://www.linkedin.com/in/tim-ring-33b7233
Larger companies have PR people to handle that kind of thing. In a startup, though, it could easily be a programmer who talks to the press, because there isn't anyone else.
I’ve done one, I’d recommend it. I have rarely talked to journalists, but the skills are useful in any situation where you’re being ‘grilled’, like a job interview.
Small things like putting the executive summary on top, starting every speech/article/email with a hook that tells the user why they care, etc. If a bunch of coders could master those skills, and combine it with data analysis and web design skills, then they could become a force that can compete with the mainstream media.
Time for me to learn jQuery and create a startup.
Programmers don't typically have to do journalism. They do have to write, but writing =/= journalism. If we're talking about writing classes for programmers, personally I don't think there's anything special about the programmer use case, as opposed to "writing in professional contexts" in general.
If you currently work at the NYT as a data-science researcher, doing the job that journalists without data-science experience can’t do, and you see your job imperilled by this, you’ll want to do exactly what these journalists are doing, but in reverse: Expanding their role to something they didn’t previously do in order to stay competitive in the job market.