ArXiv vs. SnarXiv (2010)

"- If you’re a graduate student, gloomily read through the abstracts, thinking to yourself that you don’t understand papers on the real arXiv any better.

- If you’re a post-doc, reload until you find something to work on.

- If you’re a professor, get really excited when a paper claims to solve the hierarchy problem, the little hierarchy problem, the mu problem, and the confinement problem. Then experience profound disappointment.

- If you’re a famous physicist, keep reloading until you see your name on something, then claim credit for it."

XD

Discussed a bit at the time: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1411359

Batting four for four, not sure what that means though, because I actually don't know what I'm trying to classify.

Took a year of grad level particle physics and I only managed 16/20, haha.

Highest score was 'undergrad'. This thing is rage inducing.

I would like something like this for deep learning papers.