I made a SFW porn viewer from Reddit subs
hdwallpapers.photography
hdwallpapers.photography
Also, it may be a violation of Reddit's TOS or the photographers' copyrights to redisplay this content without attribution.
I also agree with other commenters that using the term "porn" can have adverse side-effects in terms of getting the site banned in workplaces. It might also get your site misclassified by search engines. Not to mention that people who are not aware of this usage of the word could be confused about what the site is really about.
Finally, I also had problems with Firefox 67 (on Windows). The errors I'm getting in my console are:
1. Cross-Origin Request Blocked: The Same Origin Policy disallows reading the remote resource at https://www.reddit.com/r/EarthPorn/hot.json. (Reason: CORS request did not succeed).
2. The resource at “https://www.reddit.com/r/EarthPorn/hot.json” was blocked because content blocking is enabled.
In error #2, the content is blocked because Firefox thinks that www.reddit.com is a "tracker" site. If I disable content blocking for your site, it works OK in Firefox.
If possible, drop the the^H^H^H word "porn" from the top page at least.
looks like firefox' content blocking prevents some resources from loading, basically disabling your site.
apart from the obvious google tag blockage this one pops up in the console:
Cross-Origin Request Blocked: The Same Origin Policy disallows reading the remote resource at https://www.reddit.com/r/EarthPorn/hot.json. (Reason: CORS request did not succeed).
Cross-Origin Request Blocked: The Same Origin Policy disallows reading the remote resource at https://www.reddit.com/r/EarthPorn/hot.json. (Reason: CORS request did not succeed).
Firefox's security model doing its job
https://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn?utm_medium=android_app&utm...
Google already does, anything that arouses senses.
> Pornography (often abbreviated porn) is the portrayal of sexual subject matter for the exclusive purpose of sexual arousal.
The slang version just means 'pictures I appreciate'.
You just took the worst source for an English definition, felt compelled to actually include the source as if to dispel unproductive skeptical responses, and then explained what the slang version was in response to a comment telling you both the actual and slang definitions, who had asked when the slang definition will be upgraded for inclusion in the best sources for English definitions
I'll agree to disagree with you on that one.
As for my point. My point is that the word porn/porno/pornography doesn't mean what you said it does for Wikipedia. Which suggests for a large population of the world (including myself). That it has that meaning on Reddit or amongst youth is just cargo culture.
You would be in the minority by elevating Wikipedia over them, and I can just as easily modify Wikipedia and also give sources to their curators to gain consensus there. Will your opinion magically change because of that?
You don't have to use the word that way, you just have to know what people are referring to and viola language is achieved. Cargo culture is also part of the living dictionary, Oxford has accepted that before you.
Go for it, and yeah it would (tho it isn't a binary yes/no). I would still know that, generally, the new definition is popularly used among the younger people of our society; not the adolescents and elder. The question with definitions like these is whether they're keepers ie. whether they remain in use on the longer term.
> Cargo culture is also part of the living dictionary
Cargo cult isn't a definition with such seemingly conflicting meanings.
> Oxford has accepted that before you.
Irrelevant, and you don't know that for sure either.
But it is interesting how that revealed your antiquated thoughts on consensus and how that relates to the utility and cataloguing of language and how that relates that to mere communication itself. What we have is an easy to understand term, moving from slang to non-slang by various sources just from continual use. It doesn't make it difficult for you to understand, and you also don't have to use it and only understand. So it is interesting how you expand that to an inconsequential pedestal.
I would be curious if it remains in use on the longer term. I hope not. But the inclusion in these other dictionaries - whether someone modifies wikipedia or not - just makes it last longer.
PORN - Sometimes por·no [pawr-noh] /ˈpɔr noʊ/. pornography;
1 sexually explicit videos, photographs, writings, or the like, produced to elicit sexual arousal (often used attributively): arrested for selling porn; a porn star; porn films.
2 television shows, articles, photographs, etc., thought to cater to an excessive, irresistible desire for or interest in something:
edit: This seems to be based on the Cambridge dictionary (which is generally more commonly used in the UK outside of higher-level academia and journalism than the OED)
:-(