Software on Librem 5 and PinePhone Linux Phones Is Progressing Nicely | Hacker News Reader

Software on Librem 5 and PinePhone Linux Phones Is Progressing Nicely

cnx-software.com

64 pointsiamnothere14 comments

If these devices are useable it could start a movement away from Apple and Google’s ecosystems. Smart phones are no longer novel and iPhone releases don’t have the same excitement they used to. We’re getting to the point where the technology is cheap and developed enough that 3rd parties can develop their own, where before Apple and Google were the only projects with enough information to innovate on what was already out their.

In the same way IBM used to dominate the computer market but now we have raspberry pi’s with just as much power but available for basically nothing.

Thanks for posting this, I hadn't heard about the PinePhone at all. Very interesting price point ($149 for the 2GB version)!

I just hope they can get the UI smooth and responsive. All UIs of Linux phones I've used in the past (Ubuntu Touch, OpenMoko) had a laggy UI which made them unpleasant to use even if you disregard all the other usability issues. And it wasn't the hardware's fault. The same phone wasn't slow when using Android instead of Ubuntu Touch.

I'd rather have a more bland yet snappy UI than a lot of eye candy.

The Wayland based Jolla phones are very responsive in my opinion (uses Android and Jolla regularly)

Good point, SailfishOS is snappy and smooth from what I remember.

I think the problem is that if you want to have a smooth UI development costs go up exponentially. There are just a lot of details necessary to be addressed. Hard to do on low budget.

I wonder if it would be easier for these devices to build most of their UI on top of Flutter. That way, these companies could focus on the lower levels of the stack, while developers can build (or port) apps using existing tooling.

A potentially huge difference between the Purism Librem 5 and the Pine64 products is that Purism is emphasizing privacy and security.

Both companies are based in countries believed to compel compromises sometimes, but my current gut feel is I'd rather have a Librem 5.

I currently have a dumbphone, and a trail of nonworking PostmarketOS, Replicant, and FirefoxOS devices. If we could get the Librem 5 software working reasonably well atop PostmarketOS, that would provide a less-secure "budget" option for getting more people onto the platform, for people who can't swing several hundred dollars. Even were Purism to later introduce a budget device, open source and not being locked to their devices would be an encouraging sign for adopting the platform.

> A potentially huge difference between the Purism Librem 5 and the Pine64 products is that Purism is emphasizing privacy and security.

Dunno, PinePhone is said to have physical switches too.

Also all you need for privacy is complete control of the OS, which you will have on PinePhone (complete mainline Linux support, down to GPU drivers). It doesn't matter what country the HW vendor is from if the OS/bootloader is fully controlled by the user.

Main thing that will hold PinePhone back initially is lack of suspend to ram support. There are some partial solutions (WIP crust firmware), bit it's not complete, yet. There's still time though.

PinePhone will be the first smartphone I'll buy, regardless of SW support, as I'd like to play with the HW anyway. I already had plenty of fun with other mobile Allwinner SoCs in form of a A83T based tablet, and A64 is quite similar to that and very familiar to me. So all the SW I already wrote for the tablet will be easily re-targettable for PinePhone.

It will be interesting to see how Pine64 will make it usable for regular people. But for me as a programmer, it's will be a very nice device that I'll be able to fully control and experiment with without any limits. Even the power management co-processor is fully user programmable and has support in gcc toolchain since gcc 9.1.

Hardware backdoors is one real thing (the hardware is mostly closed black boxes), and that's a concern on both devices. Cutoff switches, baseband isolation, etc. don't solve everything.

BTW, that's great news about upstreamed kernel and toolchain support. IIUC, an earlier problem with some of those tablets was that there were hundreds of variations, and good luck getting a mainline kernel on any of them, or finding a second tablet if you got the first one booting with all the devices.

Well not completely black, for example Quectel modem on PinePhone is running it's own Linux system, which has many parts open sourced, and is at least pokeable and allows for not so hard reverse engineering. For anyone with enough time, now that Ghidra is available, it should be fairly straightforward to see what's hiding in there, even in the proprietary parts. You should be able to even run shell commands via some AT commands, if not via adb.

https://osmocom.org/projects/quectel-modems/wiki/Quectel

I really like both Purism and Pine64, so I'm a bit torn. Outside of phones, Pine64 is making great strides in creating an alternative to the Intel/AMD duopoly, while Purism is obviously doing really important work in terms of privacy and FLOSS advancement.

The Purism phone is pricey but I really want to support their mission and fund their continued existence. I wish I had more money to throw at these projects.

I think v1 of these phones will be disappointing, but promising. If the projects survive to launch their v3s, I’ll get excited.

If anyone on their teams is reading, the deal breaker for me is this: I need Authy, or an equiv, and Anki. Also need a step counter and my password manager to sync across devices easily. Probably slack too. Phone and texting also, but honestly the web browser would be secondary. Maps could be optional.

If a new phone could provide that, I think I could safely buy it and be able to use it as a daily driver.

The problem with Linux is that the UX and UI are always lackluster.

How do we make people work on those parts as a hobby? Can we make UX/UI have their own demo-scene culture?

I care about UX, but don't know how to influence development.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com